BBO Discussion Forums: Sick Preempt - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Sick Preempt

Poll: Sick Preempt (74 member(s) have cast votes)

Sick Preempt

  1. 2H (15 votes [20.27%])

    Percentage of vote: 20.27%

  2. P (51 votes [68.92%])

    Percentage of vote: 68.92%

  3. The opposite of whatever matmat said. (8 votes [10.81%])

    Percentage of vote: 10.81%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   rogerclee 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,214
  • Joined: 2007-December-16
  • Location:Pasadena, CA

Posted 2008-April-21, 04:23

Here is a debate between matmat and me over what constitutes a normal preempt.

White vs Red, IMPs, First Seat

♠Qx ♥987xxx ♦QTxx ♣x

What is your call?
0

#2 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2008-April-21, 04:26

Pass. Wrong ODR for preempting.
0

#3 User is offline   Free 

  • mmm Duvel
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-July-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium
  • Interests:Duvel, Whisky

Posted 2008-April-21, 04:41

With some I open these 3♥ :)
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
0

#4 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2008-April-21, 05:23

The suit is much to good (a great sequence) and the overall strength (TWO Queens AND a Ten) too big to consider this a preempt in first seat.

I cannot decide yet between 1 ♥ 2 ♣ and 6 NT.

Sorry but in first seat, even white/red this is no preempt for me.
Kind Regards

Roland

Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

#5 User is offline   cjames 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 195
  • Joined: 2007-April-02
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Norway

Posted 2008-April-21, 05:27

Pass
Squeeze me
0

#6 User is online   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,889
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-April-21, 05:39

Pass, wtp?

You could have made it more interesting, if you
would have added the 6 and 5 to the suit ...

An opening, even if you open with a preempt, contains always
a constructive message, you may decide under certain
circumstances, that you can ignore this constructive message,
but not in first seat, even if you are green vs. red.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#7 User is offline   hrothgar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,724
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Natick, MA
  • Interests:Travel
    Cooking
    Brewing
    Hiking

Posted 2008-April-21, 05:52

Playing normal methods I'd pass

If I had a two suited opening (say 2♥ = 5+ Hearts and a 4+ card minor) I'd give serious consideration to this
Alderaan delenda est
0

#8 User is offline   Gerben42 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 5,577
  • Joined: 2005-March-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Erlangen, Germany
  • Interests:Astronomy, Mathematics
    Nuclear power

Posted 2008-April-21, 05:56

Even thinking about opening this hand is an overbid (barring special agreements).
Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do!
My Bridge Systems Page

BC Kultcamp Rieneck
0

#9 User is offline   joker_gib 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,384
  • Joined: 2004-February-16
  • Location:Belgium

Posted 2008-April-21, 05:58

Passssssssssssssssss
Alain
0

#10 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2008-April-21, 06:50

duuuuuuuuuude....
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#11 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,397
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Odense, Denmark
  • Interests:History, languages

Posted 2008-April-21, 06:55

Free, on Apr 21 2008, 11:41 AM, said:

With some I open these 3♥ :)

Me too, in one partnership this is a maximum 3♥ opening under these conditions.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

#12 User is offline   Elianna 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,437
  • Joined: 2004-August-29
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Switzerland

Posted 2008-April-21, 08:36

It's a normal junior preempt; I've seen/done worse. Why do you even need to make a poll? You probably knew at the time that it was risky and aggressive, and you decided to do it anyway.
My addiction to Mario Bros #3 has come back!
0

#13 User is offline   mikegill 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 296
  • Joined: 2006-May-26

Posted 2008-April-21, 09:22

I would preempt this at MPs, but not at IMPs.
0

#14 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,397
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Odense, Denmark
  • Interests:History, languages

Posted 2008-April-21, 09:34

mikegill, on Apr 21 2008, 04:22 PM, said:

I would preempt this at MPs, but not at IMPs.

Why? I would argue the opposite: at IMPs, the favorable vulnerability means that there is more to gain by jamming opps' auction than to lose by jamming our own. This calls for less disciplined preempts. At MPs, a wrong decision in a constructive auction is equally expensive at all vulnerabilities.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

#15 User is offline   neilkaz 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,568
  • Joined: 2006-June-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Barrington IL USA
  • Interests:Backgammon, Bridge, Hockey

Posted 2008-April-21, 09:40

Pass, wanting to at least be slightly disciplined with a 2♥ preempt and noting that it often does little to shut good opps out of a ♠ game unless PD fits and can raise to 4 and the opps don't then bid 4♠
0

#16 User is offline   PassedOut 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,691
  • Joined: 2006-February-21
  • Location:Upper Michigan
  • Interests:Music, films, computer programming, politics, bridge

Posted 2008-April-21, 09:46

Sometimes a hand comes up where you wish you were playing something else. In this case I'd like to be able to preempt without misleading partner, but that would not be the situation.

Agreeing to preempt with hands like this makes it difficult for partner to compete and lead accurately than when your preempt is more normal.
The growth of wisdom may be gauged exactly by the diminution of ill temper. — Friedrich Nietzsche
The infliction of cruelty with a good conscience is a delight to moralists — that is why they invented hell. — Bertrand Russell
0

#17 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2008-April-21, 09:57

Pass.

I love to preempt at green, but there's a lot of red flags here:

1. Your suit is great for Razz, but bad for bridge.

2. A heart lead from pard is death from AQ, Kx, Kxx or Qx.
"Phil" on BBO
0

#18 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2008-April-21, 11:53

rogerclee, on Apr 21 2008, 05:23 AM, said:

Here is a debate between matmat and me over what constitutes a normal preempt.

White vs Red, IMPs, First Seat

♠Qx ♥987xxx ♦QTxx ♣x

What is your call?

I don't think it's a normal preempt but I would definitely preempt with it, 2♥. At this vul in particular, although to some extent at all vuls, I care more about playing strength than suit quality. In other words when I'm 6-4 in the range and w/r I will open 2♥ even on 765432. In fact if forced to choose I prefer 2♥ here than if the hand was xx AQxxxx xxx xx.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#19 User is offline   rogerclee 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,214
  • Joined: 2007-December-16
  • Location:Pasadena, CA

Posted 2008-April-21, 12:03

Elianna, on Apr 21 2008, 07:36 AM, said:

You probably knew at the time that it was risky and aggressive, and you decided to do it anyway.

No, I thought it was normal B). Wow, 6-4 gets no love around here.

When is the last time one of you actually got nailed at these colors? Is it actually bad if partner bids 4♥? I think the lead concern is the only big one, but RHO is at least reasonably likely to declare.
0

#20 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2008-April-21, 12:11

rogerclee, on Apr 21 2008, 10:03 AM, said:

Elianna, on Apr 21 2008, 07:36 AM, said:

You probably knew at the time that it was risky and aggressive, and you decided to do it anyway.

No, I thought it was normal B). Wow, 6-4 gets no love around here.

When is the last time one of you actually got nailed at these colors? Is it actually bad if partner bids 4♥? I think the lead concern is the only big one, but RHO is at least reasonably likely to declare.

We aren't barred from getting to 4♥ after we pass.

Getting nailed isn't my main concern here.
"Phil" on BBO
0
  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users