Page 1 of 1
an unlikely auction
#1
Posted 2012-June-05, 15:00
1♥:1N* forcing
2♥:2♠
What has partner got?
2♥:2♠
What has partner got?
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." MikeH
#2
Posted 2012-June-05, 15:05
I would play this as just shy of GF with 2 hearts, as opposed to 3H, which would be "I have enough to raise, but you should only accept heavy." Sort of the same as though partner had rebid 2m, where this is a strong raise in m.
"I think maybe so and so was caught cheating but maybe I don't have the names right". Sure, and I think maybe your mother .... Oh yeah, that was someone else maybe. -- kenberg
"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other. -- Hamman, re: Wolff
"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other. -- Hamman, re: Wolff
#3
Posted 2012-June-05, 15:09
jillybean, on 2012-June-05, 15:00, said:
1♥:1N* forcing
2♥:2♠
What has partner got?
2♥:2♠
What has partner got?
I would tend to assume both minors, but there's a nice suggestion at DoubleSqueeze to also use it to distinguish 2 & 3 card heart raises.
#4
Posted 2012-June-05, 15:12
wyman, on 2012-June-05, 15:05, said:
I would play this as just shy of GF with 2 hearts, as opposed to 3H, which would be "I have enough to raise, but you should only accept heavy." Sort of the same as though partner had rebid 2m, where this is a strong raise in m.
#5
Posted 2012-June-05, 15:13
http://cuebiddingatb...two-spades.html
http://cuebiddingatb...s-extended.html
http://cuebiddingatb...impossible.html
A few of my thoughts on the topic.
http://cuebiddingatb...s-extended.html
http://cuebiddingatb...impossible.html
A few of my thoughts on the topic.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."
-P.J. Painter.
-P.J. Painter.
#7
Posted 2012-June-05, 16:47
Both minors .
Ron .. ( the_hog ) posted the same in 2005 on the old MSN Message Board ...." a souped up version of the Impossible Spade " as he called it .
Ron .. ( the_hog ) posted the same in 2005 on the old MSN Message Board ...." a souped up version of the Impossible Spade " as he called it .
Don Stenmark
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall
" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh
K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall
" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh
K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
#8
Posted 2012-June-05, 17:25
Minors was always how I played this one.
Clee had some idea for this auction that was similar to 'minors' iirc but I don't remember what that was.
Clee had some idea for this auction that was similar to 'minors' iirc but I don't remember what that was.
Kevin Fay
#9
Posted 2012-June-05, 17:36
yes, it seems you can just bid 3h to invite
2s version of impossible 2s to show a weakish hand with long minor, forces 2nt by you.
direct 3c or 3d would be invite over 2h.
This is something alot of Bergen players play since you cant bid 1M=3m to show a minor suit.
2s version of impossible 2s to show a weakish hand with long minor, forces 2nt by you.
direct 3c or 3d would be invite over 2h.
This is something alot of Bergen players play since you cant bid 1M=3m to show a minor suit.
#10
Posted 2012-June-05, 17:44
If 3♣/♦ would be invitational then you can use 2♠ as a signoff in either minor. This is how I have always played because I use the immediate 3♣/♦ response for something else.
Otherwise I think both minors and invitational strength is more useful than a second way to invite in hearts, i.e. something like xx x KQxxx AJxxx.
Otherwise I think both minors and invitational strength is more useful than a second way to invite in hearts, i.e. something like xx x KQxxx AJxxx.
Page 1 of 1