Help
I know the rule "dont rebid 5 card minors" but is this the time to break that rule?
Page 1 of 1
bid enough? Spring Sectional B25
#1
- hooked
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 10,685
- Joined: 2003-November-15
- Gender:Female
- Location:Vancouver, Canada
- Interests:Multi
Posted 2012-May-11, 01:10
I know the rule "dont rebid 5 card minors" but is this the time to break that rule?
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." MikeH
“Let me put it in words you might understand,” he said. “Mr. Trump, f–k off!” Anders Vistisen
“Let me put it in words you might understand,” he said. “Mr. Trump, f–k off!” Anders Vistisen
#2
- Under bidder
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 11,797
- Joined: 2004-July-25
- Gender:Male
- Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Posted 2012-May-11, 01:57
I don't know that rule, but I would never bid 2D here, nor any other number of diamonds. They are vulnerable, let's defend 1NT.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.
- hrothgar
- hrothgar
#3
- AQT92 AQ --- QJ6532
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,840
- Joined: 2009-September-09
- Gender:Male
- Location:Wellington, NZ
Posted 2012-May-11, 03:51
Annoying as it is, I think you've gotta pass. Clearly partner has almost nothing, and West already bid your 2nd suit.
ahydra
ahydra
#4
- Scotland
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,754
- Joined: 2008-August-22
- Gender:Male
- Location:Scotland
Posted 2012-May-12, 05:04
If you want to bid again, you have an obvious dble to show a good hand. Dbling here after an overcall is more along the lines of "maximum overcall" than a true t/o double, so i think xx hearts is fine.
OTOH, this seems like a pretty good time to pass.
OTOH, this seems like a pretty good time to pass.
The physics is theoretical, but the fun is real. - Sheldon Cooper
#5
- 5555
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 9,519
- Joined: 2003-September-04
- Gender:Male
Posted 2012-May-12, 09:30
We don't have a fit and don't have a game, no reason to be aggressive - if we can make something, they are down in a vulnerable 1NT as Han said.
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
#6
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 3,952
- Joined: 2008-June-23
- Gender:Male
Posted 2012-May-12, 12:32
If partner has anything why would we try for +90 against our +100 or +200 right here? +90 against vul opponents at mp's is such an irritating score I never volunteer it if I have a choice.
If partner doesn't have anything we are going for anything from -100 to -500 against a very possible -90.
If partner doesn't have anything we are going for anything from -100 to -500 against a very possible -90.
When a deaf person goes to court is it still called a hearing?
What is baby oil made of?
What is baby oil made of?
#7
- Under bidder
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 11,797
- Joined: 2004-July-25
- Gender:Male
- Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Posted 2012-May-14, 04:59
phil_20686, on 2012-May-12, 05:04, said:
If you want to bid again, you have an obvious dble to show a good hand. Dbling here after an overcall is more along the lines of "maximum overcall" than a true t/o double, so i think xx hearts is fine.
I completely disagree with all of this.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.
- hrothgar
- hrothgar
#8
- hooked
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 10,685
- Joined: 2003-November-15
- Gender:Female
- Location:Vancouver, Canada
- Interests:Multi
Posted 2012-May-14, 07:22
Wisely or not, I did bid again.
2♠ -1or2
2♠ -1or2
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." MikeH
“Let me put it in words you might understand,” he said. “Mr. Trump, f–k off!” Anders Vistisen
“Let me put it in words you might understand,” he said. “Mr. Trump, f–k off!” Anders Vistisen
#9
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 10,092
- Joined: 2008-December-11
- Gender:Male
- Location:North Texas, USA
- Interests:Mountain Biking
Posted 2012-May-14, 08:45
The 2♦ rebid seems to have no effect on the final contract.
Hi y'all!
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#10
- hooked
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 10,685
- Joined: 2003-November-15
- Gender:Female
- Location:Vancouver, Canada
- Interests:Multi
Posted 2012-May-14, 09:35
Phil, on 2012-May-14, 08:45, said:
The 2♦ rebid seems to have no effect on the final contract.
Yes, true. That was not really the reason for the post, I felt my 2♦ bid was dubious.
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." MikeH
“Let me put it in words you might understand,” he said. “Mr. Trump, f–k off!” Anders Vistisen
“Let me put it in words you might understand,” he said. “Mr. Trump, f–k off!” Anders Vistisen
#11
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 4,113
- Joined: 2003-May-14
Posted 2012-May-14, 11:21
Seems declarer should make 2 spades. You can tap declarer 3 times and generate an extra trump trick for yourself, but then you get tapped in clubs and they only lose 3 trumps and 2 diamonds. Must have gotten help from a creative declarer.
As Phil noted, no effect on final contract. The admonition about not rebidding 5-cd minor is about rebidding after opening a minor, when your opening only promised 3. It goes double after an overcall, which already promised 5!
As Phil noted, no effect on final contract. The admonition about not rebidding 5-cd minor is about rebidding after opening a minor, when your opening only promised 3. It goes double after an overcall, which already promised 5!
#12
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 3,568
- Joined: 2006-June-28
- Gender:Male
- Location:Barrington IL USA
- Interests:Backgammon, Bridge, Hockey
Posted 2012-May-14, 15:48
jillybean, on 2012-May-14, 09:35, said:
Yes, true. That was not really the reason for the post, I felt my 2♦ bid was dubious.
I agree and would've passed rather than 2♦
Page 1 of 1