BBO Discussion Forums: explain me this convention over 4nt - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2

explain me this convention over 4nt

#21 User is offline   pescetom 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,096
  • Joined: 2014-February-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Italy

Posted Yesterday, 16:19

View Postjillybean, on 2026-August-04, 10:24, said:

I think it's smart to leave it blank. We can always add something in later, once we've mastered our basic system and find a cool convention worth slotting in there.

I like to fill in dangerous blanks with harmless (or even useful) but low memory load meanings whenever possible. It respects USP and reinforces the ban on traditional meaning. Here a mixed 5-card raise meets that just fine.

View Postjillybean, on 2026-August-04, 10:24, said:

I too have had it marked as splinter, you know what I think about using that bidding space.

I have no particular objection to a splinter of Responder with the right hand (space is not a cost if it would be more valuable to opponents), but it is already a low frequency affair and I don't see that we need to differentiate singleton/void or that we gain much from conserving the natural jump in other major.
0

#22 User is offline   bluenikki 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 881
  • Joined: 2019-October-14

Posted Today, 09:36

View Postmike777, on 2026-August-04, 10:52, said:

1M=3NT

Exactly what it sounds like
14-16 balanced, stoppers, 3card support.

I would not agree to a natural meaning to 3NT that did not promise 4333 in blood. Do you have any meaningful experience with your method?
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2


Fast Reply

  

25 User(s) are reading this topic
1 members, 24 guests, 0 anonymous users

  1. cencio,
  2. Google