[jillybean]

---

IMP

[P_Marlowe]

1S

[mw64ahw]

1♠
A small advantage of the TW I play is that 1♠ shows 4xx6 after 1♦

[mike777]

1S
5-4 for me, TW.

[jillybean]

TW?

[blackshoe]

Not sure, but I suspect "transfer Walsh".

[Cyberyeti]

1♠

[pescetom]

1♠ for sure by me.
Who cares about the points, which are borderline anyway?
We're in misfit but have shape and we need to exchange information.
The bad news is that over here people still bid balanced hands up the line and I could easily be 3-4.
The good news is that now we are into XYZ.

[akwoo]

2S vulnerable at IMPs, and also if I feel like I can and need to take advantage of the opps at the table.

[jillybean]

It'sIMP but we are not vulnerable, no need to take advantage of ops, this time.

Transfer Walsh OMG WTH another abbreviation to slide in there.

[Huibertus]

1♠ Maybe I'm naive but I can't see what the problem is. We're going to play 3NT, with 7 sure tricks, unless we have a ♠ fit. 1♠ is sometimes going to steer opps away from a ♠ if that is the killing lead which will bring us the 8th and potentially the 8th and 9 trick immediately.

[jillybean]

I was told after the hand, I must bid a 2♠ reverse.
This may be a difference in style perhaps, maybe Mike will have a moment between matches at Penticton to weigh in.

[mw64ahw]

jillybean, on 2026-June-16, 09:23, said:

I was told after the hand, I must bid a 2♠ reverse.
This may be a difference in style perhaps, maybe Mike will have a moment between matches at Penticton to weigh in.

maybe a 3NT reverse?

[DavidKok]

jillybean, on 2026-June-16, 09:23, said:

I was told after the hand, I must bid a 2♠ reverse.
This may be a difference in style perhaps, maybe Mike will have a moment between matches at Penticton to weigh in.

I strongly dislike this style, but there are people who will insist that, say, a 1♠ rebid shows 11-16 while a 2♠ rebid shows 17+ or some other hcp range.
The theory is that responder may have stretched with (say) 3-4 hcp and short clubs, trying to bail the partnership out of the 1♣ contract. However, an astute observer might notice that 17 opposite 4 with a misfit is not a great candidate for game, so jumping to cater to this range doesn't actually benefit the partnership much.
Instead I've mostly seen people combine these ranges with a desire to pass 1♠ with hands of up to around 7 hcp. I don't understand this at all. I have no desire to play 1♠, and I have a lot of desire to not jump with a strong hand and deny our partnership precious bidding space. I don't mind the occasional pass of 1♠ on this sequence, but it should in my opinion be reserved for hands that are worth well below a regular response - to me holding as little as a lousy 6 or decent 5 hcp is enough for responder to bid again over 1♠.

Some people take this a step further and start making 1♠ forcing, or artificial. I think they have also somewhat missed the point, but at least the damage is much smaller.

Putting it differently, it is a style question.

[P_Marlowe]

jillybean, on 2026-June-16, 09:23, said:

I was told after the hand, I must bid a 2♠ reverse.
This may be a difference in style perhaps, maybe Mike will have a moment between matches at Penticton to weigh in.

2S is NOT a reverse, it is a jump shift and forces to game.
The void in partners suit is not a plus, you have 17, try to find a fit,
after that, you can start the engine and go into overdrive.

1S should show an unbal. hand, i.e. you will show 4+ clubs, 4 spades,
and at most 3 hearts.

I like to play 1S as forcing, but dont do it in my reg. partnership, it does
not matter much.

[jillybean]

P_Marlowe, on 2026-June-16, 13:59, said:

2S is NOT a reverse, it is a jump shift and forces to game.
The void in partners suit is not a plus, you have 17, try to find a fit,
after that, you can start the engine and go into overdrive.

My response exactly, but with a little more emphasis.