BBO Discussion Forums: Hand re-evaluation - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Hand re-evaluation

#1 User is offline   axman 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 911
  • Joined: 2009-July-29
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2025-June-09, 09:07

Consider these circumstances

What are the anticipated prospects of the options available to south and how do they rank?


Diagram corrected 5 to 5

1H= 5+H 2.5+QT if balanced
1N= 15-18 balanced (with systems)
X= good hand
0

#2 User is offline   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,250
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2025-June-09, 09:51

options
1. Pass
2. Redouble quickly and with confidence, to play, or to give the opponents a chance to chicken out and run. smile
0

#3 User is offline   Huibertus 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 246
  • Joined: 2020-June-26

Posted 2025-June-09, 09:53

I'll pass. I'd expect this to make. No redouble, I'm not willing to give E/W a chance to reconsider. We have the majority of points , and partner should have stopped decently (i.e. Not AX, that'd normally be a double). We know West has the missing high cards while East has close to nothing which helps declarer play, probably throwing in West a once/twice. If it is down 1 after all, it probably still is a decent score. I'm not deciding on the basis of trusting East/West more then partner.
0

#4 User is offline   jillybean 

  • hooked
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,167
  • Joined: 2003-November-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Vancouver, Canada
  • Interests:Multi

Posted 2025-June-09, 09:54

Is XX blood?

I pass
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." MikeH
“Let me put it in words you might understand,” he said. “Mr. Trump, f–k off!” Anders Vistisen
"Bridge is a terrible game". blackshoe
0

#5 User is online   mw64ahw 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,639
  • Joined: 2021-February-13
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Interests:Bidding & play optimisation via simulation.
    Racket sports

Posted 2025-June-09, 09:59

I'd XX as a transfer advance to a minor
0

#6 User is offline   bluenikki 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 733
  • Joined: 2019-October-14

Posted 2025-June-09, 10:45

 Huibertus, on 2025-June-09, 09:53, said:

I'll pass. I'd expect this to make.

How many dummy entries are you banking on?
0

#7 User is offline   Huibertus 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 246
  • Joined: 2020-June-26

Posted 2025-June-09, 10:48

 bluenikki, on 2025-June-09, 10:45, said:

How many dummy entries are you banking on?


A couple, I'd expect West to have no choice but to provide entries after being thrown in from declarer's hand.
0

#8 User is offline   shyams 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,772
  • Joined: 2009-August-02
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2025-June-09, 11:24

I pass.

I personally won't give much weight to any other action holding this hand & with the bidding as stated.
0

#9 User is online   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,640
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2025-June-09, 11:42

Pairs or teams ? could easily be -1 for 100 vs 110
0

#10 User is offline   axman 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 911
  • Joined: 2009-July-29
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2025-June-09, 11:56

 Cyberyeti, on 2025-June-09, 11:42, said:

Pairs or teams ? could easily be -1 for 100 vs 110

Apologies. Pairs.
0

#11 User is offline   axman 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 911
  • Joined: 2009-July-29
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2025-June-11, 06:06

View Postaxman, on 2025-June-09, 09:07, said:

Consider these circumstances

What are the anticipated prospects of the options available to south and how do they rank?


Diagram corrected 5 to 5

1H= 5+H 2.5+QT if balanced
1N= 15-18 balanced (with systems)
X= good hand


Found an editing error, now corrected. H5 actually the D5.



I was looking for a counterfactual for east. When Martin Caley held the east cards he felt that it was clear to punish 1NX by leading the HK. When I held the east cards I felt that it was 90% that 2H would land at least 8 tricks while there was good likelihood that if 1N fails (probably at most 1 trick) yet with prospects to make- in other words would be less than 10% to outscore +110. (I was leading S8 against 1N to avoid possible confusion with zero or 2 honor leads and hoping to capture the HQ.) Which comes down to whether south will (should) sit for 1NX?

The case for fulfilling 1N largely rests on the position of the strong NT sitting behind the good hand- west leading away from his honors. Another facet of fulfilling 1N is the possibility that NS have an undisclosed long running suit and find it. The question being east (showing willingness to punish 1NX) what inference should sway south’s view on the likelihood of beating 1N? My view is that south ‘knows’ that his side has more paint which would infer W has long suits to compensate for the disparity of paint. If the suit is a minor- he declined to rebid it which suggests the second suit if any is spades; and (if spades were 5+) so would instead open 1S to conveniently rebid hearts that infers can expect W to hold 6 hearts and prospects of four spades (and if so the SK is likely pickled). With that view would south take a jaundiced outlook for NT and more cheerful view of clubs? My hypothesis votes for clubs contrary to Caley’s.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users