What would you bid?
#1
Posted 2020-July-05, 09:57
Which bid would you never take?
♠-
♥AKxx
♦x
♣B109876xx
#2
Posted 2020-July-05, 10:01
5C other.
Position and Vulnerability is missing.
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#4
Posted 2020-July-05, 11:46
#5
Posted 2020-July-05, 14:06
#6
Posted 2020-July-05, 19:12
ahydra
#10
Posted 2020-July-06, 00:26
The question asked is what would you bid etc in the first seat.
My answer is a firm PASS. There Are 32 HCP missing and hence I have enough time to bid appropriately on the next round.
To all those who favour some sort of preempt my question is 1)Whom are you preempting by bidding clubs IN THE FIRST SEAT? 2)These days nobody bothers or gets shouted out by a preempt in clubs. 3)You may possibly miss a Grand in hearts or clubs.
Those who play PRECISION will have no problem .They have the easiest 2♣ bid available.
And lastly some funny adjectives may be used for those who PASS.My adjective for 4C and etc is SUICIDAL.(HARAKIRI as Japanese would call it)
#11
Posted 2020-July-06, 01:51
msjennifer, on 2020-July-06, 00:26, said:
The question asked is what would you bid etc in the first seat.
My answer is a firm PASS. There Are 32 HCP missing and hence I have enough time to bid appropriately on the next round.
To all those who favour some sort of preempt my question is 1)Whom are you preempting by bidding clubs IN THE FIRST SEAT? 2)These days nobody bothers or gets shouted out by a preempt in clubs. 3)You may possibly miss a Grand in hearts or clubs.
Those who play PRECISION will have no problem .They have the easiest 2♣ bid available.
And lastly some funny adjectives may be used for those who PASS.My adjective for 4C and etc is SUICIDAL.(HARAKIRI as Japanese would call it)
Answer to 1. The opponents, possibly partner, but odds of 2-1 in favour
Answer to 2. Any pre-empt makes life difficult for the opponents, including ♣s. A 4♣ bid especially as if the hand in 4th is strong, the hand in 2nd won't know exactly whether partner is balancing or has a good hand.
Answer to 3. I take that chance, though if we have a slam in ♣s or ♥s the opponents are more than likely to be stacked in ♦s or the top suit ♠s. Rarely is there one distributional hand around the table when one hand has 8410 shape.
Answer to Precision: Yes, it's an ideal system for this hand. I also thought of a 2♣ Precision bid here.
Answer to Pass: I don't disagree with Pass here either. But it does allow the opponents two bids to state their values.
Answer to Suicide (Hara-kiri): On normal breaks the hand has 8 tricks with ♣s as trumps. We're not doing anything suicidal here, but I agree it's not-run-of-the-mill either. Both Pass and pre-empting in ♣s could work here. It's a view.
#12
Posted 2020-July-06, 01:53
Style matters here. What will partner expect for a 4♣ opening? Or 1♣? Or pass? All of these actions are possible and might work better - a lot depends on who holds the spades!
"Which bid would you never take?" - I wouldn't bid 3♣
#13
Posted 2020-July-06, 05:51
ahydra, on 2020-July-05, 19:12, said:
ahydra
Sir,
Exactly Sir..The possession of ♥AKxx completely overrules any thought of a preemptive bid in clubs where the suit is headed only by a miserly JACK..One does not want partner to lead a club at all ,unless that is his normal NATURAL lead,if LHO buys the auction.OH, I aim sorry.Those who preempt will certainly make a LIGHTNER DOUBLE asking him to lead something((?)else but clubs.And then ,of course he will lead a heart.Or won't he !Why imagine what opponents can have as ones partner too can have a giant of a distributional hand with total misfit. Partner certainly will not expect THIS hand if a high level club preempt is made.And a very large number of advanced players do play well defined bids of 4C/.D as transfer to H/S with 012 formula as per the vulnerability(using 4H/S opening bid as per 123 formula) THANKS.
#14
Posted 2020-July-06, 05:51
ahydra, on 2020-July-05, 19:12, said:
ahydra
Sir
One can also IMAGINE partner leading the ♣King from Kx and boy! will the faces be red as two ♥losers are discarded.
#15
Posted 2020-July-06, 08:22
#16
Posted 2020-July-06, 16:31
Huibertus, on 2020-July-06, 08:22, said:
Yes, that could be true. But let's say the opponents remain silent and partner opens 1♠. Where does that leave you? Partner's open in 3rd so 2♣ would be Drury if you use that convention. 3♣ would be Bergen if you use that convention. And 4♣ would be seen a splinter. But you can't bid any of these. So, the only bid left is 5♣.
I agree it's an extreme example but many advanced players could be using these conventions.
#17
Posted 2020-July-06, 17:32
2nd seat: pass.
3rd seat: 4♣ vul, 5♣ nonvul.
4th seat: pass.
#19
Posted 2020-July-07, 01:53
FelicityR, on 2020-July-06, 16:31, said:
I agree it's an extreme example but many advanced players could be using these conventions.
In that case you pass, put your hand face down on the table and go for a long walk. I hear nature can be very calming.
#20
Posted 2020-July-07, 04:13
Finanzier, on 2020-July-05, 09:57, said:
Which bid would you never take?
♠-
♥AKxx
♦x
♣B109876xx
I would pass regardless of the vulnerability and the seat. Unless partner opens the bidding. I am staying shtum. With only 8 hcp and no biddable suit ,it's a no brainer
- Dr Tarrasch(1862-1934)German Chess Grandmaster
Bridge is a game where you have two opponents...and often three(!)
"Any palooka can take tricks with Aces and Kings; the true expert shows his prowess
by how he handles the two's and three's" - Mollo's Hideous Hog
+++++++++++++++++++
Assuming MPs, 1st seat, None vul, I rank
1. 4♣ = PRE Unless South African Texas.
2. 5♣ = PRE Put your faith in the long suit.
3. 3♣ = PRE Underbid.
4. 1♣ = NAT Misdescriptive.
5. Pass = NAT Pusilanimous.
6. Other bids e.g. 7NT = Avoid.