Opening bid?
#1
Posted 2016-June-03, 12:09
We play weak 2-bids with Ogust. All are vulnerable. RHO/dealer passes, and I have:
♠ K 10 8 6 5 4
♥ K Q 8 4 3
♦ -
♣ 5 2
What should I bid?
#2
Posted 2016-June-03, 12:32
We play weak 2-bids with Ogust. All are vulnerable. RHO/dealer passes.
What should I bid?
- 1♠ = NAT. Get the show on the road.
- 2♠ = NAT. OK in Zia Style. More fraught using Ogust. If partner responds 2N, you might experiment with a 4♥ rebid.
- Pass = NAT. Hoping to cue-bid, bid 2N. or double later.
#3
Posted 2016-June-03, 12:57
I can live with 1♠ or pass, I'd open, but we open fairly light anyway.
#6
Posted 2016-June-03, 16:29
In 2nd red, it is often better to have sound bids so I'm not opening at the 1 level (KQxxxx Kxxxx might tempt me better though).
After passing I'll probably scream my 2-suiter next, if I can.
#7
Posted 2016-June-03, 22:10
If you do decide to step in with this hand, then you've got to bid 1 ♠ rather than 2 ♠. Give partner as little as ♠ x ♥ Axxxx ♦ xx ♣ xxxxx and 4 ♥ is virtually lay down. If you open 2 ♠, partner may never be able to explore for a ♥ fit.
#8
Posted 2016-June-04, 03:04
#9
Posted 2016-June-04, 03:05
#10
Posted 2016-June-04, 04:00
If you open 2S - as mentioned before the higest risk is missing out on a heart fit. I doubt the bidding would go 2S all pass - just because you are looking at a lot of shape - but the problem is that opening a preempt you are telling your partner that you want to play spades unless he really insists on something else - which frankly is not the case with your hand - you would like to play in any of the major suits.
As for 1 spade opening - the biggest problem is that when your partner has minimum forcing game values and you overbid, cause you do not have a full opening bid - although 4M will have some play anyway.
#11
Posted 2016-June-07, 03:54
#12
Posted 2016-June-07, 04:44
el mister, on 2016-June-07, 03:54, said:
Yeah, suit not good enough, wrong seat/vul, both majors.
3rd green AKQxxx, x, x, Jxxxx 4♠ easy.
#13
Posted 2016-June-07, 05:00
If not av., I am going with Pass.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#14
Posted 2016-June-07, 05:29
I'm a little bitter because I played 3NT=65 majors either way (learned it from fred) in hundreds of hands of bridge but it never came up.
edit: oops Marlowe just mentioned it.
This post has been edited by gwnn: 2016-June-07, 05:29
George Carlin
#15
Posted 2016-June-07, 11:45
gwnn, on 2016-June-07, 05:29, said:
What strength?
#16
Posted 2016-June-07, 11:47
Jinksy, on 2016-June-07, 11:45, said:
weak-ish. in terms of hcp maybe 6-10? the point of it (for me) wasn't to change the range of 1-level openings, at least not too much. this was in contrast to the way constructive weak twos, where I was happy opening 2M on hands otherwise I would've opened 1M on. Not sure how standard this all is.
George Carlin
#17
Posted 2016-June-07, 18:32