vulnerable game
#21
Posted 2014-March-28, 13:28
#22
Posted 2014-March-28, 13:36
FrancesHinden, on 2014-March-27, 16:03, said:
the hog, on 2014-March-27, 18:15, said:
Jinksy, on 2014-March-28, 06:51, said:
Lord Molyb, on 2014-March-28, 13:00, said:
#23
Posted 2014-March-28, 13:45
the hog, on 2014-March-27, 18:15, said:
It is OK Hog, there was such a little time between the dates Frances posted the OP and your reply, we all understand how it can be missed before the results were posted, while you replied ***** loads of other topics.
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#24
Posted 2014-March-28, 23:39
When I was young and foolish and couldn't play the game properly, I might also have bid 3NT; then I started playing with an excellent player, an English international whose name would be well known to Frances. He imbued me with many ideas about bidding, including not bidding on trash like this. He also taught me to overcall more frequently with the boss suit. I guess his ideas must have worked, as his previous partner won a couple of world championships.
#25
Posted 2014-March-28, 23:41
Jinksy, on 2014-March-28, 06:51, said:
Do I? Hardly! I have my own opinions.I do however not suffer fool gladly.
#26
Posted 2014-March-31, 06:10
#27
Posted 2014-March-31, 14:13
Slow tray is not completely irrelevant: if pard hesitated, the bid is safe. If RHO hesitated, it need not be because he's strong. He could be considering some sort of psyche if weak. So there is a *slight* tendency for the bid to be safer than with normal tray tempo.
Still, I'm willing to jump onto the bidding because (1) I have more than a min opener and (2) I'm vulnerable.
#28
Posted 2014-April-01, 06:24
Jinksy, on 2014-March-31, 06:10, said:
Perhaps someone could interpret my original post for you.
As I posted before, "I do not suffer fools gladly."
#29
Posted 2014-April-15, 03:40
Jeff Sapire quoted this hand in a thread about the Doctors on BridgeWinners. Wladow's decision to pass 3♦ out is indeed remarkable. The hand has much better prospects than the one we Frances asks about - holding Axx in the preempt suit gives is much more control of the hand. The point is when we are able to shut out lefty, we will often make game on less than 25 points, but it partner has an 11 count with two small opposite our Qxx, we can lose the first six tricks.
I held the hand discussed in this thread and would like to think I would have passed out 3♣, but West did not preempt at my table.
#30
Posted 2014-April-15, 03:42
Now this is a 3NT bid:
Qx
KT4
Axx
AKJxx
#31
Posted 2014-April-15, 19:08
the hog, on 2014-April-15, 03:42, said:
♠ Q x ♥ K T 4 ♦ A x x ♣ A K J x x
♠ Q ♥ K T x ♦ A x x x ♣ A K J x x
Because now, it's more likely that the partnership has a ♠ stop?