For example:
- 1T: 16-18
- 2T or 1NT: 19-21
- 3T or 2NT: 22-24
And so on; further looking around seems to show a fairly universal agreement that the same contract level in trumps almost always requires less total points then that in no-trumps. This got me thinking, wouldn't it be simpler if we kept the table to static levels (i.e. 25 TP for all 3-level contracts) but included an additional set of distribution points for level-of-fit? I'm aware that many guides say not to add both "length" and "shortness" in distribution, however it looks like it is quite common among several evaluation methods.
To keep it simple, what I'm thinking is a point increase for the amount of additional trumps you hold over opponents. With 8 trumps, you get +3 points (8-5); with 9, you get +5 (9-4) and so on.
Does this sound reasonable, or am I overlooking something?