Help
1♣ - p - p - 3♠
What should 3♠ show and why?
moderator, move to Novice and Beginner Forum if this belongs there, thanks
Page 1 of 1
Double jump in balancing position
#2
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 7,786
- Joined: 2004-September-05
- Gender:Male
- Location:Galloway NJ USA
-
Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.
Posted 2012-April-17, 17:13
It is a hand too good to pass in balancing seat but still preemptive in nature. A hand with playing tricks but not much defense. Something like:
KQJTxxx
Kx
QJx
x
KQJTxxx
Kx
QJx
x
#3
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,247
- Joined: 2010-October-21
- Gender:Male
- Location:Texas
Posted 2012-April-17, 17:13
Mike Lawrence's book: The Complete Book on Balancing ... p.18 ( Green paperback ):
" A good preempt with which you expect to make opposite a random 10 count"
One of his examples:
K J 10 8 7 6 4
3
A J 5
4 2
" A normal, sound preempt. The main thing is, it is not a pile of trash. "
" A good preempt with which you expect to make opposite a random 10 count"
One of his examples:
K J 10 8 7 6 4
3
A J 5
4 2
" A normal, sound preempt. The main thing is, it is not a pile of trash. "
Don Stenmark
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall
" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh
K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall
" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh
K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
#4
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 472
- Joined: 2011-April-17
- Gender:Male
- Location:US, Irvine CA
Posted 2012-April-17, 18:56
It's a bid without clear agreement in most partnership and should not be used if you don't have agreement.
Definition in Mike Lawrence's book is a good approach. Another approach I've seen is solid trump with 8 playing trick("1 trick below the contract you bid")
Definition in Mike Lawrence's book is a good approach. Another approach I've seen is solid trump with 8 playing trick("1 trick below the contract you bid")
#5
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 636
- Joined: 2011-December-01
- Gender:Not Telling
- Location:UK
-
Interests:Bridge, Poker, but not in conflation.
Statistics, but not massaged by the media.
Posted 2012-April-17, 20:52
It clearly expects to score better than letting 1♣ be passed out. Depending on vulnerability this probably means expecting to make on average, or at white perhaps going no more than one down. It suggests raising to 4 with a reasonable hand and fit.
A perfection of means, and confusion of aims, seems to be our main problem Albert Einstein
Page 1 of 1