BBO Discussion Forums: Lefty opens 3D - are you protecting? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Lefty opens 3D - are you protecting?

Poll: Lefty opens 3D - are you protecting? (16 member(s) have cast votes)

Your action in 4th seat?

  1. Pass (3 votes [18.75%])

    Percentage of vote: 18.75%

  2. X (13 votes [81.25%])

    Percentage of vote: 81.25%

  3. Something else - is there any other option? (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   jules101 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 166
  • Joined: 2008-March-06

Posted 2012-April-11, 06:52

Match pointed pairs



Yuck!

What's it going to be?

Please explain your choice. Thanks.
0

#2 User is offline   mr1303 

  • Admirer of Walter the Walrus
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,563
  • Joined: 2003-November-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
  • Interests:Bridge, surfing, water skiing, cricket, golf. Generally being outside really.

Posted 2012-April-11, 07:00

I must... stop.... bidding on these hands. No good can come of it....!

I'd probably double and concede -300 against nothing. I do this far too often.
0

#3 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2012-April-11, 07:10

Clear double. I would balance with less.

Partner should not act in direct seat over 3♦ without a sound hand - an above average opening bid. So you must act in balancing seat with anything close to an opening hand unless you have a good reason not to.

I would not be the least surprised to make a game on this hand.
0

#4 User is offline   billw55 

  • enigmatic
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,757
  • Joined: 2009-July-31
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2012-April-11, 07:36

I definitely double at matchpoints, I'm not getting rich selling out to 3♦. Tougher question at IMPs.
Life is long and beautiful, if bad things happen, good things will follow.
-gwnn
0

#5 User is offline   Phil 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,092
  • Joined: 2008-December-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Texas, USA
  • Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2012-April-11, 08:51

View Postmr1303, on 2012-April-11, 07:00, said:

I must... stop.... passing these hands. No good can come of it....!



fyp
Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
0

#6 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2012-April-11, 10:13

Having seen what BBO posters would have taken direct action on, the main hope of a balancing double is +800. That would be a good thing, to be weighed against the minuses when we get too high or are already too high.

It is a close call.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#7 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2012-April-11, 10:19

Double. My problem would be tempo, in that I would be afraid of revealing to partner accidentally how clear this double is by doubling too quickly.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
1

#8 User is offline   quiddity 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,099
  • Joined: 2008-November-21

Posted 2012-April-11, 11:33

I think it's close. Just because partner can have a 14-count doesn't mean that he's at all likely to have one, and the three little spades are ominous. Say partner has a 9-count with 4 spades. That's a very likely hand for him to hold and he'll probably bid 3S and could easily end up down 2 which would be a disaster.

Consider your expectations when you picked this hand up - a balanced 11-12 r/r at matchpoints where the opponents have a diamond fit, what's likely to happen? Sure some of the time we might have a game or we might double them or whatever, but imo what usually happens is the opponents compete to 3D and we sell. Bidding past 3D r/r is no joke!
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users