[rduran1216]

So I'm directing a local bridge game while I sit on here, and get called to the table

At trick 10 west led a spade, and south, declaring 3 diamonds, ruffs with the 10 of diamonds, then leads back the Ace of spades to trick 11. After its all settled the result is 3 diamonds down 5


3 Rounds later I get called to the table, and on the exact same board, in the exact same contract and situation, south ruffed the spade lead with the diamond 10 and led the A of spades to trick 11.

lol.

[barmar]

The board is haunted.

[EricK]

If that was the only way to make the contract, is it surprising that two declarers found it?

[Statto]

Great minds revoke alike

[Cyberyeti]

Not had that, but on consecutive sessions of the same monthly tournament, I had opponents fail to follow to a suit on the first round, fail to follow to the second round then realise they had a card in the suit.

[mycroft]

One director's instructions: "If you're going to revoke, your opponents *will* notice if you lead that suit to the next trick. If you wait a few tricks, they might have forgotten..."
And a player - who is very much not noted for this kind of sense of humour at the table, especially not at the opponents' expense: "Our opponents have invented a novel method of crossruffing. West led a diamond that East ruffed, and then East led a diamond that West ruffed." (Please note, the opponents were exactly the pair to phrase it that way against. She *still* apologized to them afterward.)