Just Curious
#1
Posted 2012-January-19, 20:47
9876543
void
void
AKQJTx
Yopu get a 3H opening on your right. Your bid?
#2
Posted 2012-January-19, 21:46
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#4
Posted 2012-January-19, 22:22
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#5
Posted 2012-January-19, 22:30
Edit: 4 spades makes sense yeah.
#7
Posted 2012-January-20, 01:19
4spades-----and if 5 hts comes up from either opp....
Inow x and lead a club...
if 4 spades x passsssssssssssssssssssssssss
#8
Posted 2012-January-20, 01:23
bigbenvic, on 2012-January-19, 23:16, said:
Is this the only 4H vote?
#9
Posted 2012-January-20, 02:31
George Carlin
#10
Posted 2012-January-20, 04:14
#11
Posted 2012-January-20, 06:32
#12
Posted 2012-January-20, 06:40
I like 3♠, if partner raises voluntarilly we have a good shot at 6♠, we might be able to show clubs next. And if partner does something that smells like short spades we can bid 6♣
#13
Posted 2012-January-20, 08:00
Fluffy, on 2012-January-20, 06:40, said:
By bidding 4♥, showing spades and a minor? If partner doesn't bid 4♠, there is a good chance that he has a singleton spade - with Hx he would tend to choose 4♠.
I'd bid 4♥, planning to pass 4♠ but bid 6♣ over anything else.
Edit: on reflection, a singleton spade probably isn't enough if partner has only three clubs. They may lead a trump, which is often right against this sort of sequence; or the hand with two spades may have three clubs and make a trump trick; or spades may be 4-1. I think we should settle for game.
This post has been edited by gnasher: 2012-January-20, 08:06
#14
Posted 2012-January-20, 09:36
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
#16
Posted 2012-January-20, 10:16
benlessard, on 2012-January-20, 09:36, said:
Sure, 4H! as Michaels works well over a 3H preempt, but what about over a 3S preempt ( It takes you to the 5-level in ♥ )?
That is why someone came out with 4C! and 4D! as = that minor and the other major.
And over a 3-minor preempt :
... 4C! = other minor and a major (4D* asks major)
... 4D! = both majors
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall
" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh
K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
#17
Posted 2012-January-20, 14:23
#18
Posted 2012-January-20, 22:54
mattias, on 2012-January-20, 10:13, said:
From memory the 2 or the 3.
Gwnn, playing with an average partner i would expect 4H to show S and a minor. Surely this is standard? In my regular partnership I would bid 4C Non Leaping Michaels.
#19
Posted 2012-January-20, 23:06
the hog, on 2012-January-20, 22:54, said:
Gwnn, playing with an average partner i would expect 4H to show S and a minor. Surely this is standard? In my regular partnership I would bid 4C Non Leaping Michaels.
Fwiw nothing is any good at all. LHO has the oustanding 13 black cards and partner has 6 hearts and AKQJxxxx in Ds
Yes it was a goulasch. I don't know why I bother playing in these.
#20
Posted 2012-January-21, 19:54
the hog, on 2012-January-20, 23:06, said:
Yes it was a goulasch. I don't know why I bother playing in these.
Thats why i dont only play them, but also skip the topics about them. It is like trying to make sense out of nonsense.
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."