Bermuda Bowl 2011 Universal Thread
#141
Posted 2011-October-27, 01:19
#143
Posted 2011-October-27, 02:39
#144
Posted 2011-October-27, 03:11
whereagles, on 2011-October-27, 02:39, said:
They're going to have to play those 128 boards really fast.
London UK
#145
Posted 2011-October-27, 03:27
chasetb, on 2011-October-26, 19:28, said:
Borrow a laptop and bring it to class? Your instructor will understand....
Go Justin! Gogogogogo.
Never tell the same lie twice. - Elim Garek on the real moral of "The boy who cried wolf"
#146
Posted 2011-October-27, 05:14
whereagles, on 2011-October-27, 02:39, said:
Fred already is
#147
Posted 2011-October-27, 05:21
JLOGIC, on 2011-October-27, 05:14, said:
And you're multiple junior world champion if I remember correctly, that's also something don't you think?
#148
Posted 2011-October-27, 05:25
Free, on 2011-October-27, 05:21, said:
Doesn't qualify me to say im a WORLD CHAMPION, I think if I did people would rightfully laugh at me. I would always qualify it with world junior champ, world senior champ, or world womens champ if it was a restricted event.
But yeah, its definitely something, being the best at something in your age group is a big achievement that I am proud of.
#151
Posted 2011-October-27, 08:36
#152
Posted 2011-October-27, 08:40
#153
Posted 2011-October-27, 09:33
Mbodell, on 2011-October-27, 00:05, said:
And I've been going to bed at 145 with ESPN radio streaming the world series, and get up in the morning to watch BBO. It's a great time for streaming entertainment online.
Never tell the same lie twice. - Elim Garek on the real moral of "The boy who cried wolf"
#154
Posted 2011-October-27, 15:43
kgr, on 2011-October-27, 08:40, said:
What is the next round and who is placed for it?
They already played round of 16, and half of quarterfinals.
I found it quite surprising that it took us 150 hands to determine the 16 teams qualifying, but only 24 boards to determine wich team goes on to quarterfinals, but there was no time to do anything better, since at the start only 8 teams would go over swiss round.
#155
Posted 2011-October-27, 16:36
#156
Posted 2011-October-27, 17:46
jallerton, on 2011-October-27, 16:36, said:
It's interesting that it took a couple of days for the organisers to realise they had 150+ teams in the field. Also, the level of entry wasn't really that abnormally large compared to 2007 (146 teams) and 2005 (134 teams). I suspect that the fact that several of the "big name" teams were quite a distance off qualifying at the half-way point may have had something to do with it. In Australia we call this practice "moving the goal posts after the game has started".
I ♦ bidding the suit below the suit I'm actually showing not to be described as a "transfer" for the benefit of people unfamiliar with the concept of a transfer
#157
Posted 2011-October-27, 23:44
jallerton, on 2011-October-27, 16:36, said:
Reminds me of the 2007 world mixed pairs scandal in Turkey, where the field for the final was enlarged after the result from the semi final had been posted.
Aside from the very dubious procedure I agree that 16 qualifying teams was much more reasonable in this Transnationals.
#158
Posted 2011-October-28, 01:26
#159
Posted 2011-October-28, 01:45
jallerton, on 2011-October-27, 16:36, said:
I found it more surprising that the format of the match for 3rd/4th in the BB, VC and SB could be changed because a captain's meeting wanted it changed.
Rik
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
#160
Posted 2011-October-28, 02:42
mfa1010, on 2011-October-27, 23:44, said:
Aside from the very dubious procedure I agree that 16 qualifying teams was much more reasonable in this Transnationals.
I think the Blunt team is the only top 8 team that lost their round of 16 match. It is odd to change the format partway through.