your call?
#1
Posted 2011-May-31, 10:29
Vul v. not
N E S W
2C* 3D P** P
3H 4D ?
* = strong, 22+ or 8 1/2 tricks
** = not a double negative hand
Also: Anyone want to publish useful agreements for comp over Our 2/1 2C opener? It seems to me that, most of the time, letting O know whether R is bust or holds some values is good enough, waiting for O to reopen with a descriptive call. OTOH....?
Regards and Happy Trails,
Scott Needham
Boulder, Colorado, USA
#2
Posted 2011-May-31, 10:38
My alternative is to pass and bid 4♥ over the x (and 4N over 4♥), but surely I'm too good for that.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#3
Posted 2011-May-31, 10:40
You now officially have a + in your profile for the form and substance of the question .
#4
Posted 2011-May-31, 13:35
#5
Posted 2011-June-01, 00:01
#7
Posted 2011-June-01, 02:41
#8
Posted 2011-June-01, 03:55
Free, on 2011-June-01, 02:41, said:
I dunno what it looks like but it ain't voidwood. Thats the only cue available.
whereagles, on 2011-June-01, 00:01, said:
Pd opens 2♣, and RHO tells you he owns the ♦ suit. Your pd has the world plus moon, if not the whole galaxy.
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#9
Posted 2011-June-01, 04:08
2) pass=random game force
3) 3h shows long h and 4 loser hand.
4) 4h now...
5) 5d close second choice
pard does not promise the sun moon and galaxy in fact pard shows minimum hand at this point
#10
Posted 2011-June-01, 05:14
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#11
Posted 2011-June-01, 05:37
mike777, on 2011-June-01, 04:08, said:
Construct me a hand, where RHO bids the ♦ suit at 3 level and bids again at 4 level by himself (w/o support from his pd) and pd has a 2♣ opener. What 4♥ are u talking about ? You would bid 4♥ with this if your pd opened weak 2♥ or overcalled 1 ♥ for Christ's sake !
Yes your pd has minimum, in fact i will give him less than u suggested some 5 loser hands.. Are u happy with 4 ♥ ? AK AQJxx xxx AKx or here i give him some wasted ♦ hcps Axx AQxxx KJ AKJ or KQx AQJxxx AJx A.
4♥ huh ? Well at least u didn't DBL 4♦. Only thing that comes to my mind worse than 4♥ is to DBL 4♦ and suggest pd we defend this hand. Ohh i see, by saying minimum hand, you count beans, pd = 22 hcp we have 6 hcp, 28 hcp wont make slam so lets stop at 4 ?
And by the way, just out of curiosity, at which point did you decide pd showed a minimum 2♣ opener ? Was it the 2 ♣ bid or 3♥ bid that indicated the minimum hand ?
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#12
Posted 2011-June-01, 07:35
MrAce, on 2011-June-01, 05:37, said:
That's pretty difficult, because most decent RHO's would bid 4♦ immediately or pass in their second turn...
#13
Posted 2011-June-01, 10:05
bidding tools available to you. Pass and pull is stronger than bidding
directly so over the 4d bid i suggest
4h around 4 points generally balanced
p pull p probable x to 4h around 7 balanced
4n your favorite form of blackwood*
p and pull probable x to 4n to play*
5d dia control (almost assuredly short around 4 points) (promises H suupport)
p pull probable x to 5d same as 5d bid but around points)(promises heart support)
5h around 10 balanced with heart support
6d dia void around 4 points (promises heart support)
p pull probable x to 6d same as 6d but around 7 points
you still have 4s 5c 5s 5n available for different agreements
* these two reversed using pass/pull logic because there is an
inference available that when p does not take control of the
bidding it is because they cannot. Therefore the immediate use
of 4n as blackwood leaves this inference intact.
Using this method I would bid 5d over 4d but I downgrade
queens and especially jacks for slam purposes so I would
treat this as aropund a 5 point hand.
#14
Posted 2011-June-01, 10:59
JLOGIC, on 2011-May-31, 13:35, said:
Well what can you say? Zambonis are not for everybody
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#15
Posted 2011-June-02, 11:49
Free, on 2011-June-01, 07:35, said:
Well, I tried to employ the nice little boxed quotation thingie, but I guess I'll ahve to read up on the tools. Sigh.
Anyhoo, the actual hands don't contribute much to the problem posed, (1) partner didn't have a 2C opener and (2) RHO indeed should've bounced immediately. Partner's hand was a 2N opener, and not a "cherce" (Spencer Tracey, _Pat & Mike_ I think ) one at that: AKx AJ98x KQ Axx. Even so, if partner had understood the 5D call, I would think 5H is auto.
Regards and Happy Trails,
Scott Needham
Boulder, Colorado, USA