Help
We were playing the following system if there had not been a 2♦ bid (for better or worse):
X: MM or m
2m: M and the bid m
2M: natural
2NT: unusual (mm)
What would you bid here?
Edit: Thanks to wyman for providing a better view of the problem below.
Page 1 of 1
Interfere with their no trump How to do it?
#1
- Lamentable Bunny
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,505
- Joined: 2008-March-01
- Gender:Male
- Location:Portland, ME
Posted 2011-February-08, 17:05
Bridge Personality: 44 44 43 34
Never tell the same lie twice. - Elim Garek on the real moral of "The boy who cried wolf"
Never tell the same lie twice. - Elim Garek on the real moral of "The boy who cried wolf"
#2
- Redoubling with gusto
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,712
- Joined: 2009-October-19
- Gender:Male
- Location:Las Vegas, NV
- Interests:Math, Bridge, Beer. Often at the same time.
Posted 2011-February-08, 17:54
yw
"I think maybe so and so was caught cheating but maybe I don't have the names right". Sure, and I think maybe your mother .... Oh yeah, that was someone else maybe. -- kenberg
"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other. -- Hamman, re: Wolff
"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other. -- Hamman, re: Wolff
#3
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 8,375
- Joined: 2005-February-09
- Gender:Male
- Location:Zurich, Switzerland
Posted 2011-February-08, 18:54
2♥, a Michaels cuebid of responder's shown suit. Perfect hand for that method. 
Adam W. Meyerson
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
#4
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 16,809
- Joined: 2003-October-07
- Gender:Male
Posted 2011-February-08, 20:37
awm, on 2011-February-08, 18:54, said:
2♥, a Michaels cuebid of responder's shown suit. Perfect hand for that method.
ditto
#5
- Vesuvius the Violent Volcano
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 3,216
- Joined: 2008-December-04
- Gender:Male
- Location:Tampa-Area, Florida
- Interests:SLEEPING
Posted 2011-February-08, 21:25
Funny, I had almost the exact same hand last weekend, didn't end well though, we wound up in 3♠ X -3, anyway yes 2♥ should be Michaels and is perfect for this hand.
Yay for the "Ignored Users" feature!
#6
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 14,900
- Joined: 2004-May-11
- Gender:Male
- Location:Portugal
- Interests:Everything!
Posted 2011-February-14, 17:56
x4
#7
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,247
- Joined: 2010-October-21
- Gender:Male
- Location:Texas
Posted 2011-February-15, 06:58
ditto5
Don Stenmark
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall
" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh
K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall
" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh
K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
#8
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 10,611
- Joined: 2009-September-15
- Gender:Female
- Location:London
Posted 2011-February-24, 01:20
Why is everyone in agreement that 2♥ is Michaels? I think that it is much more popular to play it as just takeout.
I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones -- Albert Einstein
#9
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 879
- Joined: 2009-December-20
- Gender:Male
- Location:Podunk, backwater USA
Posted 2011-February-24, 02:06
Vampyr, on 2011-February-24, 01:20, said:
Why is everyone in agreement that 2♥ is Michaels? I think that it is much more popular to play it as just takeout.
Probably because you could double (immediately?) for takeout.
"It's not enough to win the tricks that belong to you. Try also for some that belong to the opponents."
"Learn from the mistakes of others. You won't live long enough to make them all yourself."
"One advantage of bad bidding is that you get practice at playing atrocious contracts."
-Alfred Sheinwold
"Learn from the mistakes of others. You won't live long enough to make them all yourself."
"One advantage of bad bidding is that you get practice at playing atrocious contracts."
-Alfred Sheinwold
#10
- Andy Bowles
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 11,993
- Joined: 2007-May-03
- Gender:Male
- Location:London, UK
Posted 2011-February-24, 02:49
Vampyr, on 2011-February-24, 01:20, said:
Why is everyone in agreement that 2♥ is Michaels? I think that it is much more popular to play it as just takeout.
chasetb said:
Probably because you could double (immediately?) for takeout.
I think it's better to play either 2♥ or double as takeout.
However, most people seem to play that double shows diamonds, 2♥ is Michaels, and with a takeout double you pass initially. Here is a post which exlains why Fred thinks that's best:
http://www.bridgebas...lan/#entry52275
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
#11
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 10,611
- Joined: 2009-September-15
- Gender:Female
- Location:London
Posted 2011-February-24, 03:05
chasetb, on 2011-February-24, 02:06, said:
Probably because you could double (immediately?) for takeout.
Many people play this as diamonds.
I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones -- Albert Einstein
#12
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 10,696
- Joined: 2006-May-18
- Gender:Not Telling
Posted 2011-March-04, 06:24
I think this is a Pond issue. In America it seems to be relatively standard to play the immediate cue as Michaels. I know Fred has spoken up very strongly that this method is far superior to the alternative. In Britain it was popularised in the 80s to play the cue as a strong take-out and a delayed double as weak take-out and this is (arguably) still the default method there. If playing this British method the proper procedure is to Pass 2♦ and then to bid 2NT if/when 2♥ is passed back to you. This shows specifically the black suits as with diamonds and another you would have doubled initially. It is less important which method you play so much as agreeing it with partner.
(-: Zel :-)
#13
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,512
- Joined: 2003-February-16
Posted 2011-March-04, 07:52
I have never found players using the micheals idea discussed here. We have always played bidding into transfer suit as a t/o.
#14
- Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 9,586
- Joined: 2005-September-21
- Gender:Male
- Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
- Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor
Posted 2011-March-04, 10:07
I echo that 2♥ as Michaels seems best, and I don't think it close.
As an aside, this came up not too long ago at the local club. My wife and I had not yet discussed this. The resulting auction was a piece of work:
Opener: 1NT (15-17, could have a five-card major)
Wife: Pass
Responder: 2♦ (transfer to hearts)
Me: 2♥
Opener: "What's 2♥?"
Wife: Not sure.
Opener: Double (With 2533 shape, we should set this.)
Wife: Pass
Responder: Pass
Me: 2♠ (Seems about right.)
Opener: [Hmmm. This seems weird. But, we are not vulnerable and Ken is vulnerable. So, Ken probably is telling the truth (WHAT THE F?????). Partner must have psyched.] 3NT
Wife: Pass
Responder: Pass
Me: Pass
The opening lead was a spade, and we took the first five tricks, planning to yield the rest. We ended up with one more somehow.
In the end, I did realize that a 5-5 heart fit is not that good if you still get a 5-0 split.
As an aside, this came up not too long ago at the local club. My wife and I had not yet discussed this. The resulting auction was a piece of work:
Opener: 1NT (15-17, could have a five-card major)
Wife: Pass
Responder: 2♦ (transfer to hearts)
Me: 2♥
Opener: "What's 2♥?"
Wife: Not sure.
Opener: Double (With 2533 shape, we should set this.)
Wife: Pass
Responder: Pass
Me: 2♠ (Seems about right.)
Opener: [Hmmm. This seems weird. But, we are not vulnerable and Ken is vulnerable. So, Ken probably is telling the truth (WHAT THE F?????). Partner must have psyched.] 3NT
Wife: Pass
Responder: Pass
Me: Pass
The opening lead was a spade, and we took the first five tricks, planning to yield the rest. We ended up with one more somehow.
In the end, I did realize that a 5-5 heart fit is not that good if you still get a 5-0 split.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."
-P.J. Painter.
-P.J. Painter.
Page 1 of 1