BBO Discussion Forums: simple (?) 3NT contract - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

simple (?) 3NT contract

#1 User is offline   Coelacanth 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 252
  • Joined: 2009-July-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Minnesota, USA

Posted 2010-June-21, 13:46

Scoring: IMP

You reach 3NT after a transfer sequence with the opponents silent. (1NT-2D-2H-3NT)

South leads a small . I won't tell you what I did at the table (I was declarer) but let's say you win the in your hand (North plays the 9) and play A and another . South wins theJ and shifts to the 10.

Now what?

If you didn't win the and play hearts, what other line did you try?
Brian Weikle
I say what it occurs to me to say when I think I hear people say things; more, I cannot say.
0

#2 User is offline   Apollo81 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,162
  • Joined: 2006-July-10
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maryland

Posted 2010-June-21, 14:11

The biggest inference that we can take from the 10 switch is that the hearts are 3-3. If they weren't breaking, South wouldn't risk leading away from the KT, not knowing who holds the J.

<changed previous rest-of-post to the following>

I would expect South to hold the 8 and North to hold the T from what happened on trick 1. In this case South has led from J8xx, a terrible lead against NT IMO. It was probably his only 4-card suit, or maybe it's possible from the diamond spots that it was a 5 card suit.

So if he was 3343, with KJx, he might have played the K on the second round of that suit, forcing an entry into North's hand. If he did that, we might assume the hearts are 4-2 (North with 4) and finesse clubs out of desperation, which is what he would want if he doesn't hold the K. Therefore North is likely to hold 4 clubs and both round suit Kings, so I would go up with the A and play a third heart.

This post has been edited by Apollo81: 2010-June-21, 14:47

0

#3 User is offline   Coelacanth 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 252
  • Joined: 2009-July-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Minnesota, USA

Posted 2010-June-21, 15:46

Those are some excellent inferences.

I don't think this particular South was up to the entry-creating play of the K from KJx.

You are correct that South is 3343 and has led from 8xxx.

North does indeed have the KJxx.
Brian Weikle
I say what it occurs to me to say when I think I hear people say things; more, I cannot say.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users