Help
IMPs.
xx
Q1098
KJx
xxxx
1C - 1H
2S - ??
support with support?
#1
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,987
- Joined: 2009-February-15
Posted 2010-June-08, 03:52
and the result can be plotted on a graph.
#2
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 10,093
- Joined: 2008-December-11
- Gender:Male
- Location:North Texas, USA
- Interests:Mountain Biking
Posted 2010-June-08, 03:59
2N. Not sure I want to encourage pard too strongly with slow values in the red suits.
Hi y'all!
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#3
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 10,728
- Joined: 2003-March-07
- Gender:Male
- Location:Laos
- Interests:Wagner and Bridge
Posted 2010-June-08, 04:55
hanp, on Jun 8 2010, 04:52 PM, said:
IMPs.
xx
Q1098
KJx
xxxx
1C - 1H
2S - ??
xx
Q1098
KJx
xxxx
1C - 1H
2S - ??
2S is a mini splinter?
If not, I agree with Phil's 2NT bid.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
#4
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,987
- Joined: 2009-February-15
Posted 2010-June-08, 05:10
Obviously 2S shows either a single suited gameforce or a gameforce with 6+ clubs and 3 hearts....
and the result can be plotted on a graph.
#5
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 4,485
- Joined: 2009-July-14
- Gender:Male
- Location:London
Posted 2010-June-08, 05:13
hanp, on Jun 8 2010, 12:10 PM, said:
Obviously 2S shows either a single suited gameforce or a gameforce with 6+ clubs and 3 hearts....
I think this joke has gone over my head.
Gordon Rainsford
London UK
London UK
#6
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 6,373
- Joined: 2003-March-15
- Location:Hamburg, Germany
- Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball
Posted 2010-June-08, 05:31
I would show a hand that is 6-9 balanced with diamonds well stopped. (3 NT for me)
If I am unable to do so, I would show a weak hand with club fit. 2 Nt followed by 3 NT for me)
If I cannot show this either, I would change the system asap and try to survive after 2 NT.
If I am unable to do so, I would show a weak hand with club fit. 2 Nt followed by 3 NT for me)
If I cannot show this either, I would change the system asap and try to survive after 2 NT.
Kind Regards
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#7
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,987
- Joined: 2009-February-15
Posted 2010-June-08, 05:40
gordontd, on Jun 8 2010, 06:13 AM, said:
hanp, on Jun 8 2010, 12:10 PM, said:
Obviously 2S shows either a single suited gameforce or a gameforce with 6+ clubs and 3 hearts....
I think this joke has gone over my head.
It was a reaction to Hog's question.
and the result can be plotted on a graph.
#8
- Andy Bowles
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 11,993
- Joined: 2007-May-03
- Gender:Male
- Location:London, UK
Posted 2010-June-08, 06:00
3♣. That doesn't commit us to slam, or to clubs. The thought of concealing four-card club support on this auction horrifies me.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
#9
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,502
- Joined: 2007-December-22
Posted 2010-June-08, 06:21
3♣, I feel the same way as gnasher.
If we bid 2NT we have to go above 3NT to show club support, this way at least 3NT is still possible and now we have supported clubs.
If we bid 2NT we have to go above 3NT to show club support, this way at least 3NT is still possible and now we have supported clubs.
That's impossible. No one can give more than one hundred percent. By definition that is the most anyone can give.
#10
- enigmatic
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 4,757
- Joined: 2009-July-31
- Gender:Male
Posted 2010-June-08, 07:02
655321, on Jun 8 2010, 07:21 AM, said:
3♣, I feel the same way as gnasher.
If we bid 2NT we have to go above 3NT to show club support, this way at least 3NT is still possible and now we have supported clubs.
If we bid 2NT we have to go above 3NT to show club support, this way at least 3NT is still possible and now we have supported clubs.
Agree, partner still has 3♦ as a stopper ask right?
Life is long and beautiful, if bad things happen, good things will follow.
-gwnn
-gwnn
#11
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 3,814
- Joined: 2009-July-23
- Gender:Male
- Location:New Orleans
Posted 2010-June-08, 08:08
gordontd, on Jun 8 2010, 06:13 AM, said:
hanp, on Jun 8 2010, 12:10 PM, said:
Obviously 2S shows either a single suited gameforce or a gameforce with 6+ clubs and 3 hearts....
I think this joke has gone over my head.
me too! I thought partner had at min, distribution 4xy5 not that 3xy6 is ruled out 100% but is stepping lightly if so.
"Tell me of your home world, Usul"
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#12
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,640
- Joined: 2009-February-16
Posted 2010-June-08, 08:30
I like 2NT. Yeah it feels awkward to suppress 4-card support but how can we have slam unless partner has 6 clubs? If he does we can raise his 3♣ re-rebid and I don't feel worse than us raising to 3♣ right away and him bidding 4♣. If he bids 3 of a red suit or 3NT over 2NT then I think we can be fairly confident that 3NT is right.
Obviously I would never bid 3NT if that's what I have to do to show a minimal balanced hand.
Obviously I would never bid 3NT if that's what I have to do to show a minimal balanced hand.
"Are you saying that LTC merits a more respectful dismissal?"
#13
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,987
- Joined: 2009-February-15
Posted 2010-June-08, 08:33
Are you really raising 3C?
and the result can be plotted on a graph.
#14
- The Abbess
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 17,398
- Joined: 2004-April-22
- Gender:Female
- Location:Odense, Denmark
- Interests:History, languages
Posted 2010-June-08, 08:51
hanp, on Jun 8 2010, 12:10 PM, said:
Obviously 2S shows either a single suited gameforce or a gameforce with 6+ clubs and 3 hearts....
oh sorry, I assumed we were playing T-Walsh and my 1♥ was a misclick.
Anyway, agree with Phil.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
#15
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,950
- Joined: 2008-April-05
- Gender:Male
- Location:Copenhagen
- Interests:Model-Railways.
Posted 2010-June-08, 08:51
3♣ seems obvious. If I do not bid this, the last insignificant reason for not playing 2♠ artificial, is gone with the wind.
_____________________________________
Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.
Best Regards Ole Berg
_____________________________________
We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:
- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.
Gnasher
Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.
Best Regards Ole Berg
_____________________________________
We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:
- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.
Gnasher
#16
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,208
- Joined: 2007-July-01
- Gender:Male
- Location:Michigan
- Interests:Science, Sports
Posted 2010-June-08, 09:30
billw55, on Jun 8 2010, 08:02 AM, said:
655321, on Jun 8 2010, 07:21 AM, said:
3♣, I feel the same way as gnasher.
If we bid 2NT we have to go above 3NT to show club support, this way at least 3NT is still possible and now we have supported clubs.
If we bid 2NT we have to go above 3NT to show club support, this way at least 3NT is still possible and now we have supported clubs.
Agree, partner still has 3♦ as a stopper ask right?
Kevin Fay
#17
- World International Master without a clue
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 17,404
- Joined: 2003-November-13
- Gender:Male
- Location:madrid
Posted 2010-June-08, 10:05
3♣ for me, hopefully rebidding 3NT
#18
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 13,705
- Joined: 2005-June-15
- Gender:Male
- Location:Canada
- Interests:Bridge, golf, wine (red), cooking, reading eclectically but insatiably, travelling, making bad posts.
Posted 2010-June-08, 10:27
gnasher, on Jun 8 2010, 07:00 AM, said:
3♣. That doesn't commit us to slam, or to clubs. The thought of concealing four-card club support on this auction horrifies me.
Agreed
And consider AKxx x Ax AKxxxx surely nothing special about this hand on the auction. Do we really want to suggest to partner that our hand is so bad that we may be passing 3♣? xxx KQxx Jxx xxx would be a 2N call....and pass 3♣.
I agree that we can bid 2N intending to bid again....but...what are we bidding and why would partner understand it?
Surely we can't bid 2N then 4♣? Why waste an entire level of bidding to force beyond 3N on this hand?
Surely we can't bid 2N then 3N? Well, maybe we can...but do we have agreements as to the difference between this and an immediate 3N? (I would: the slow route shows doubt, the fast route shows both reds very well stopped and no fit and no slam interest). And how can we plan to NEVER show the club suit?
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
#19
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,640
- Joined: 2009-February-16
Posted 2010-June-08, 12:33
I didn't know that 2S could be considered not game-forcing.
"Are you saying that LTC merits a more respectful dismissal?"
#20
- Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 9,586
- Joined: 2005-September-21
- Gender:Male
- Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
- Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor
Posted 2010-June-08, 12:37
hanp, on Jun 8 2010, 06:40 AM, said:
gordontd, on Jun 8 2010, 06:13 AM, said:
hanp, on Jun 8 2010, 12:10 PM, said:
Obviously 2S shows either a single suited gameforce or a gameforce with 6+ clubs and 3 hearts....
I think this joke has gone over my head.
It was a reaction to Hog's question.
Kind of funny to me. Last night, in the partnership bidding room, my partner and I had the auction:
1♣-P-1♠-P-
3♦-P-3♥-P-
4♣-P-4♦-P-
4♠-all pass
3♦ was showing 6+ clubs and 3 spades.
LOL
Not that this auction applies, but...
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."
-P.J. Painter.
-P.J. Painter.