mikeh, on Jun 8 2010, 11:27 AM, said:
gnasher, on Jun 8 2010, 07:00 AM, said:
3♣. That doesn't commit us to slam, or to clubs. The thought of concealing four-card club support on this auction horrifies me.
Agreed
And consider AKxx x Ax AKxxxx surely nothing special about this hand on the auction. Do we really want to suggest to partner that our hand is so bad that we may be passing 3♣? xxx KQxx Jxx xxx would be a 2N call....and pass 3♣.
I agree that we can bid 2N intending to bid again....but...what are we bidding and why would partner understand it?
Surely we can't bid 2N then 4♣? Why waste an entire level of bidding to force beyond 3N on this hand?
Surely we can't bid 2N then 3N? Well, maybe we can...but do we have agreements as to the difference between this and an immediate 3N? (I would: the slow route shows doubt, the fast route shows both reds very well stopped and no fit and no slam interest). And how can we plan to NEVER show the club suit?
Mike! GF, not a reverse

Help
