Over A GF
#1
Posted 2008-January-30, 09:47
♠x
♥Kxxxx
♦QJTxxx
♣x
LHO opens 1♠ and RHO tries a natural, GF 2♣.
6-5 come alive?
#2 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2008-January-30, 09:53
#4
Posted 2008-January-30, 10:34
- hrothgar
#5
Posted 2008-January-30, 11:04
Jlall, on Jan 30 2008, 03:53 PM, said:
You're right. That's why I bid 2NT
#6
Posted 2008-January-30, 11:23
Jlall, on Jan 30 2008, 10:53 AM, said:
Agreed.
There seems to be a high likelihood that the opps will bid to a poor spot, if we keep silent. We bid, and they are warned both in the auction and in the play.
Sure, this could be wrong, but the percentages, and the vulnerability, suggest letting them hang themselves if possible.
As for perpetrating the unusual 2N, when down 2 is a likely loss and down 3 a probable disaster, colour me chicken. I can just imagine partner sitting there with Q109x xxx xx J109x and having to bid 3♥ after opener doubles 2N
#7
Posted 2008-January-30, 11:29
#8
Posted 2008-January-30, 11:33
#9
Posted 2008-January-30, 11:49
#10
Posted 2008-January-31, 10:12
whereagles, on Jan 30 2008, 09:04 AM, said:
Jlall, on Jan 30 2008, 03:53 PM, said:
You're right. That's why I bid 2NT
I actually posted this 'problem' as an instructional exercise. I was going to put it into the B/I, but I thought that would have made it too obvious.
We are RED on WHITE. We don't hold the spades. The chances of us buying this contract for 4♥ or 5♦ doubled and it being profitable are zero.
Bidding simply gives the opponents information they aren't entitled to. Do you think it mattered? My pard bid a very ill-advised 2♦.
This time, the 2♣ bidder flies into 7N with the spade suit of ♠Kxxxxx opposite ♠AJx. The contract relies on finding the Q and with pard's call, it wasn't too tough to hook me.
If you pass, you will either push the board in 6♠ or you will win 14. He isn't picking up the spade suit if you are silent, although in fairness he might, since pard isn't leading a stiff trump against a grand. Why would anyone do that? (
Bidding was an expensive lesson and a loss of 11. Lesson learned for him (I hope).
#12
Posted 2008-February-01, 08:56
"6-5, come a live" that was my plan,
thats why i passed the first time.
With kind regards
Marlowe
PS: There are lessons to be learned, and it
takes time, sometimes one needs to get
burned more than once.
Of course, if you get burned to often, your
brain may have been evaporated during
the trial period.
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#13
Posted 2008-February-01, 14:50
pclayton, on Jan 31 2008, 04:12 PM, said:
whereagles, on Jan 30 2008, 09:04 AM, said:
Jlall, on Jan 30 2008, 03:53 PM, said:
You're right. That's why I bid 2NT
I actually posted this 'problem' as an instructional exercise. I was going to put it into the B/I, but I thought that would have made it too obvious.
We are RED on WHITE. We don't hold the spades. The chances of us buying this contract for 4♥ or 5♦ doubled and it being profitable are zero.
Bidding simply gives the opponents information they aren't entitled to. Do you think it mattered? My pard bid a very ill-advised 2♦.
This time, the 2♣ bidder flies into 7N with the spade suit of ♠Kxxxxx opposite ♠AJx. The contract relies on finding the Q and with pard's call, it wasn't too tough to hook me.
If you pass, you will either push the board in 6♠ or you will win 14. He isn't picking up the spade suit if you are silent, although in fairness he might, since pard isn't leading a stiff trump against a grand. Why would anyone do that? (
Bidding was an expensive lesson and a loss of 11. Lesson learned for him (I hope).
Thanks for the lesson, but you only told half the story. Since you're so good, I'm sure you can dig out the other half.

Help
