when is ok to lead a singleton defending a suit contract
#1
Posted 2007-October-20, 15:23
In general I saw most b/i players prefer to lead the singleton when defend a suit contract.
best regards
jocdelevat
#2
Posted 2007-October-20, 15:33
Honoring the information that p conveys is not only technically a good thing, it also makes the game more enjoyable for both partners.
#3
Posted 2007-October-20, 16:01
If you spend time watching the jec matches (a worthwhile activity), you will have plenty of opportunities to hear Larry Lande list "Benito's four rules". Those are:
1) You need a good excuse not to lead trumps
2) If you don't lead a singleton, you have not got one
3) Every card on defense should mean something
4) These rules have exceptions, you must learn them
Number 4 may be the most important - for instance, leading a singleton trump (#1 and #2) is not such a great thing to do, and leading partner's suit may be better than trump or singleton leads.
At the B/I level, players have not enough experience yet to always get it right (world class players do not always get it right). Your partner made a reasonable choice, and it did not work today. That adds to their experience and if they think about the whole hand, maybe they will see some clue that might have led them to the winning choice. If so, then they have more experience than they did before this hand. At least they did not forsake your suit to lead some other doubleton or (horror) from three small of some other suit. Once your partner's start making the best lead choices on a consistent basis, they will be moving out of the BIL.
#4 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2007-October-20, 16:38
#5
Posted 2007-October-20, 16:46
#6
Posted 2007-October-20, 16:49
'If you dont lead a stiff you aint got one'

oh I see this has been said already
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
#7 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2007-October-20, 16:50
helene_t, on Oct 20 2007, 05:46 PM, said:
I just love leading singletons, it has so much to gain and generally if it loses it's only a tempo loss. There is no easier way to set something like 4M than stiff lead to pards ace, ruff, over to partners other ace, ruff. Or maybe partner has a trump entry. Or...
#8
Posted 2007-October-20, 18:05
This time it didn't work out. Oh well. That does not prove it was wrong or a mistake.
#9
Posted 2007-October-20, 21:57
best regards
jocdelevat
#10
Posted 2007-October-21, 05:50
#11
Posted 2007-October-21, 15:26
#12
Posted 2007-October-21, 21:43
- Partner has to have the balance of the strength between you (to get in to give ruffs)
- You have to not have natural trump tricks (like if you had KTxx you'd lead your long suit to force decl and get extra trick in trumps)
- the auction mustn't have called for something else (fairly obvious)
#13
Posted 2007-October-22, 08:49
"gwnn" said:
hanp does not always mean literally what he writes.
#14
Posted 2007-October-22, 10:34
jocdelevat, on Oct 20 2007, 04:23 PM, said:
In general I saw most b/i players prefer to lead the singleton when defend a suit contract.
I may be weird, but....
If my partner bid 1♠ over dealer's 1♥, I would lead a singleton. I would expect partner has some strength elsewhere, and it could easily be in trumps or the singleton suit.
But if my partner bid 2♠ over dealer's 1♥, then I would lead his suit. The implication with a Weak Jump Overcall is that partner does not have quick tricks outside of his suit, and I need quick tricks to use a singleton.
But maybe that's just me.
#15
Posted 2007-October-28, 11:02
That's just the way I think of things.