Yke Smith and Toine van Hof write in the recent issue van IMP about optional Stayman, meant to find 3NT despite a 4-4 fit if both hands are 4333 or with stuff in the doubleton and a poor trump suit.
1NT-2♣
2♦*-2♠**
*Can have a 4-card major in a hand more suitable for 3NT
**Pubbet to 2NT, now responder can show a 4-card major with a hand suitable for a suit contract even if opener's hand is not.
Hands with four spades and a longer minor bid directly 3m after the 2♦ rebid, while hands with four hearts and a longer minor go through the 2♠ bid in response to opener's 2♦.
Any thoughts? I obviously has some disadvantages when responder is weak (the 2♠ follow up to Stayman is not available, and it is less safe to pass the 2♦ rebid when responder is 4441 or (43)42, so I probaby wouldn't want to play it in a weak NT context. But for strong NT pair it may be worthwhile?
Page 1 of 1
Optional Stayman
#1
Posted 2024-June-11, 02:48
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
#2
Posted 2024-June-11, 03:43
Hi,
if you are concerned about the 4333 shape, there are already methods that show this hand type,
with the 4 card major, if I remember correctly it is usually responder, the visible hand (in 3NT).
One method uses 3H / 3S by responder to do this, so the question is, what do they gain versus this
method.
With kind regards
Marlowe
if you are concerned about the 4333 shape, there are already methods that show this hand type,
with the 4 card major, if I remember correctly it is usually responder, the visible hand (in 3NT).
One method uses 3H / 3S by responder to do this, so the question is, what do they gain versus this
method.
With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
Page 1 of 1