(1m)----x---(pass)-1♥
(pass)-1NT-(pass)-2♠
What is 2♠ most commonly played as by theory-aware tournament players, using mainstream methods (so not something with Power Doubles, Herbert Negative, transfer advances or stuff that affects the 1NT range such a raptor)?
Page 1 of 1
Responding to t/o doubles
#1
Posted 2021-July-05, 20:23
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
#2
Posted 2021-July-05, 20:52
In more than 40 years of playing, albeit with some long breaks, I’ve never seen this auction, so I am not answering based on experience
However, bridge logic suggests it has to be forcing, and the same logic suggests 4-5 majors
Partner has shown 18+ to 20 hcp.
He hasn't promised 4 spades so 2S will often force him to bid, since he can’t really pass with fewer than 4 spades.
We would/should respond 1S with 4=4 or 5=5 majors, even with a Yarborough since we need to cater to partner bidding 1N or cuebidding.
So we have 4-5 majors and enough to be comfortable forcing to at least 2N even if we have no fit. Therefore we have to be strong enough to handle a non-fit auction so we should be forcing opposite a fit.
Plus, if we are 4=5 majors with, say, 6-7 hcp we need to force to game but we also need to show our shape
Meanwhile, if we have a very weak hand, we pass 1N or bid 2H.
However, bridge logic suggests it has to be forcing, and the same logic suggests 4-5 majors
Partner has shown 18+ to 20 hcp.
He hasn't promised 4 spades so 2S will often force him to bid, since he can’t really pass with fewer than 4 spades.
We would/should respond 1S with 4=4 or 5=5 majors, even with a Yarborough since we need to cater to partner bidding 1N or cuebidding.
So we have 4-5 majors and enough to be comfortable forcing to at least 2N even if we have no fit. Therefore we have to be strong enough to handle a non-fit auction so we should be forcing opposite a fit.
Plus, if we are 4=5 majors with, say, 6-7 hcp we need to force to game but we also need to show our shape
Meanwhile, if we have a very weak hand, we pass 1N or bid 2H.
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
#3
Posted 2021-July-06, 02:14
mikeh, on 2021-July-05, 20:52, said:
In more than 40 years of playing, albeit with some long breaks, I’ve never seen this auction, so I am not answering based on experience
However, bridge logic suggests it has to be forcing, and the same logic suggests 4-5 majors
Partner has shown 18+ to 20 hcp.
He hasn't promised 4 spades so 2S will often force him to bid, since he can’t really pass with fewer than 4 spades.
We would/should respond 1S with 4=4 or 5=5 majors, even with a Yarborough since we need to cater to partner bidding 1N or cuebidding.
So we have 4-5 majors and enough to be comfortable forcing to at least 2N even if we have no fit. Therefore we have to be strong enough to handle a non-fit auction so we should be forcing opposite a fit.
Plus, if we are 4=5 majors with, say, 6-7 hcp we need to force to game but we also need to show our shape
Meanwhile, if we have a very weak hand, we pass 1N or bid 2H.
However, bridge logic suggests it has to be forcing, and the same logic suggests 4-5 majors
Partner has shown 18+ to 20 hcp.
He hasn't promised 4 spades so 2S will often force him to bid, since he can’t really pass with fewer than 4 spades.
We would/should respond 1S with 4=4 or 5=5 majors, even with a Yarborough since we need to cater to partner bidding 1N or cuebidding.
So we have 4-5 majors and enough to be comfortable forcing to at least 2N even if we have no fit. Therefore we have to be strong enough to handle a non-fit auction so we should be forcing opposite a fit.
Plus, if we are 4=5 majors with, say, 6-7 hcp we need to force to game but we also need to show our shape
Meanwhile, if we have a very weak hand, we pass 1N or bid 2H.
4-6 2 or 3 count ? prepared to play 3♥ if no spade fit would be about the only possibility for a NF bid, but I agree, probably more useful as forcing unless you play an artificial 2 of opener's minor here for the GF hand.
#5
Posted 2021-July-06, 03:16
AL78, on 2021-July-06, 02:34, said:
Could it be 6-5 in the majors, looking for game in the best fit?
This is unlikely - such a hand would almost certainly have done more the previous round.
I play mostly IMPs, where you sometimes sacrifice precision in partscores in exchange for improved chances of finding the right game. This looks like a place to apply that principle, and I would expect 4-5 in the majors and some modest values (basically, what mikeh said). There may be an argument for different principles to apply at MPs, but I would expect this understanding to be fairly standard.
Page 1 of 1
++++++++++++++++++
After partner's 1N rebid, 2♠ seems natural, constructive, but non-forcing with 4 ♠s and longer ♥s.
(Assuming that a cue-bid would show a better hand).