(You are playing weak NT and four card majors if that makes any difference)
Page 1 of 1
Tricky Rebid #1
#1
Posted 2020-December-27, 04:20
Playing cross-IMPs in a good standard field. You open 1♣ then have a choice on the second round. What'll it be?
(You are playing weak NT and four card majors if that makes any difference)
(You are playing weak NT and four card majors if that makes any difference)
#2
Posted 2020-December-27, 05:55
This is an awkward problem since you wish to compete but partner is probably broke. If you had four hearts or better clubs, then action would be clear.
I expect the best action is to pass and I'd probably do this if my mouse had not already doubled.
I think passing is a lot clearer in a weak no trump, 4-card major system where one club is essentially natural.
I expect the best action is to pass and I'd probably do this if my mouse had not already doubled.
I think passing is a lot clearer in a weak no trump, 4-card major system where one club is essentially natural.
#3
Posted 2020-December-27, 09:52
partner has passed twice. he's broke. different vulnerability. pass is safe. X is not so good
#5
Posted 2020-December-27, 13:52
Uneasy. The hand lacks a bit of texture or a 4th H to be safer at red IMPs. I hope I can pass quickly enough in case partner finds a bid although he is likely to have a nondescript 6HCP hand with 4 S suit.
#6
Posted 2020-December-27, 15:17
I'm going to wimp out and pass. For a take-out double I'd want to be showing a stronger hand and preferably with 4 hearts. Partner is allowed to convert, and this looks ominously like -670 opposite that nondescript 6hcp with 4 spades.
#7
Posted 2020-December-27, 22:05
The cardinal rule: Do not balance at imps. (Yes, technically this isn't a balancing bid, but it's an analogous situation).
They haven't bid 4!S yet. Don't give them a chance to upgrade their stiff !C holding.
They haven't bid 4!S yet. Don't give them a chance to upgrade their stiff !C holding.
#8
Posted 2021-January-03, 07:31
Thanks for all the thoughtful replies.
To finish the story, 2♠ was indeed passed out. Here is the full deal
Board 15
As was predicted, South had a weak hand with Spades.
As it happens, we beat 2♠ by a couple of tricks to gain 1.18 IMPs. Declarer could have gone one off in 2♠, and we could have made 3♣.
To finish the story, 2♠ was indeed passed out. Here is the full deal
Board 15
As was predicted, South had a weak hand with Spades.
As it happens, we beat 2♠ by a couple of tricks to gain 1.18 IMPs. Declarer could have gone one off in 2♠, and we could have made 3♣.
#9
Posted 2021-January-03, 13:45
Looks like an easy double to me. Why isn't partner allowed to have a 3352 8-count?
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
Page 1 of 1
+++++++++++++++++++++
I rank:
1. Double = T/O. but doesn't show 0445 Flexible. A reasonable hope for a good score is that partner has a ♠ stack.
2. Pass = NAT. Conservative.
3. 3♣ = NAT. Unilateral but some say "Put your faith in the long suit".