BBO Discussion Forums: Ethics? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Ethics?

#1 User is offline   Hilver 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 128
  • Joined: 2006-October-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Netherlands
  • Interests:Besides bridge, cycling and reading

Posted 2015-October-12, 05:59

Matchpoint pairs
West dealer / all vulnerable

Sitting South You hold:
10 8 7 3 2
A 6
A K 10 9 6
9

After displaying the STOP-card from the biddingbox, West opens 4. After West removing the STOP-card after 10 seconds, North still thinks about 10 seconds and then passes.
Your RHO, East, passes too.
Should South pass or is South still allowed to double, or make a bid of 4, 4NT or 5?

Thx

Jan
0

#2 User is offline   weejonnie 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 801
  • Joined: 2012-April-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North-east England
  • Interests:Bridge Laws, croquet

Posted 2015-October-12, 11:49

What would North have done with
876
QJ874
QJ4
43

He would have passed - so the UI is that he has values, but not enough to take action. It is unlikely he has values in spades as he would have passed quicker.

I think I would have to find out (if possible) if North has a reputation for taking time for making calls - some people are naturally quick and others slow.
(As a matter of course, South can do what he wants at the table, the director will make a record and then come back if requested.)
So now we have a BIT (I assume double is for takeout)

So we look at 73C and 16B1

C. Player Receives Unauthorized Information from Partner
When a player has available to him unauthorized information
from his partner, such as from a remark, question, explanation, gesture,
mannerism, undue emphasis, inflection, haste or hesitation, an
unexpected* alert or failure to alert, he must carefully avoid
taking any advantage from that unauthorized information.

B. Extraneous Information from Partner
1. (a) After a player makes available to his partner extraneous information
that may suggest a call or play, as for example by a remark, a question, a
reply to a question, an unexpected* alert or failure to alert, or by
unmistakable hesitation, unwonted speed, special emphasis, tone, gesture,
movement, or mannerism, the partner may not choose from among logical
alternatives one that could [b]demonstrably[/b1] have been suggested over another
by the extraneous information

So the LAs seem to be - Pass, X, 4, 5, 4NT

The UI suggests values so X, 4, 5, 4NT are suggested over the pass. (This is subject to discussion, some of these may turn out not to be LAs - but 73C still applies)
Note that if very few players would pass then Pass stops being an LA and any bid is acceptable.

Ergo - THOSE calls are contra indicted. South can bid 6, 5, 5 or some such as they definitely aren't LAs

If you feel very strongly about this your best argument to avoid a PP would say that you felt that at matchpoints pass was not a LA - good luck with that!
No matter how well you know the laws, there is always something that you'll forget. That is why we have a book.
Get the facts. No matter what people say, get the facts from both sides BEFORE you make a ruling or leave the table.
Remember - just because a TD is called for one possible infraction, it does not mean that there are no others.
In a judgement case - always refer to other TDs and discuss the situation until they agree your decision is correct.
The hardest rulings are inevitably as a result of failure of being called at the correct time. ALWAYS penalize both sides if this happens.
0

#3 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,199
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Interests:History, languages

Posted 2015-October-13, 02:25

It is of course possible that North was thinking of bidding 5. This might make it less attractive for South to bid. But I think that on balance the hesitation makes it more attractive to bid (or double). So the ethical choice is to pass.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users