[surelyours]

不明白这种“不公平”是为什么：


我这桌，机器人懂得将吃就能宕。


另一桌，机器人知道先不将吃，让人家做成。

[lycier]

欢迎贴主来到华人论坛。

抱歉的是，你的问题我帮助不了，对于机器人体系的研究我也是今年才开始，目前经验不多，打单人桥牌也就打了3000多付，同时也在bbo机器人论坛发表了大量的相关帖子，应当指出机器人在不断地改进，也许你打的是初级机器人，高级机器人就会好一点。

机器人体系注释链接

[lycier]

 surelyours, on 2014-February-06, 21:59, said:

不明白这种"不公平"是为什么：


我这桌，机器人懂得将吃就能宕。


另一桌，机器人知道先不将吃，让人家做成。

你的帖子反馈的非常好，我刚刚把你所反馈的内容转发到bbo机器人论坛，请拭目以待吧，但别指望获得最后明确答复。
该帖在机器人论坛链接

[surelyours]

 lycier, on 2014-February-06, 23:19, said:

你的帖子反馈的非常好，我刚刚把你所反馈的内容转发到bbo机器人论坛，请拭目以待吧，但别指望获得最后明确答复。
该帖在机器人论坛链接

感谢您的帮助！以后有机器人的问题，知道去那边看看啦！

作为新人，请前辈多关照！

[bgm]

I believe that GIB use some sort of Monte Carlo technique - typically simulating some hand based on the current information and then do a double-dummy analysis. So inherently there are some randomness inside it. Even you give the identical situation to the same robot repeatedly, the decision may varies from time to time.

[surelyours]

 bgm, on 2014-February-07, 00:17, said:

I believe that GIB use some sort of Monte Carlo technique - typically simulating some hand based on the current information and then do a double-dummy analysis. So inherently there are some randomness inside it. Even you give the identical situation to the same robot repeatedly, the decision may varies from time to time.

Thank you,it seems true.

The only reason I could guess was the design of randomness.

[surelyours]

 lycier, on 2014-February-06, 22:41, said:

欢迎贴主来到华人论坛。

抱歉的是，你的问题我帮助不了，对于机器人体系的研究我也是今年才开始，目前经验不多，打单人桥牌也就打了3000多付，同时也在bbo机器人论坛发表了大量的相关帖子，应当指出机器人在不断地改进，也许你打的是初级机器人，高级机器人就会好一点。

机器人体系注释链接

收到！多谢！您太谦虚了！

[lycier]

 surelyours, on 2014-February-07, 00:30, said:

Thank you,it seems true.

The only reason I could guess was the design of randomness.

机器人有时候是会有昏头的现象，今天bbo相关人士向那个我透露，他们也即将推出新的一版，改善一些功能。

[haikuo]

感觉是出牌顺序引发的吧