barmar, on 2013-April-23, 10:09, said:
Which law are you saying now is being ignored? We currently seem to be talking about a law that allows declarer to do something at a particular time. But the laws also allow him to do it at other times. If he rarely chooses to do it at the particular time, instead using the other legal times, does that mean he's ignoring the law or it's just not useful to him?
<sigh> I used to think I was pretty good at communicating, but given the number of people here who don't understand what I've said, or claim that I've said something other than what I said, it seems that I was wrong. I'll try to work on that. In the meantime...
I'm talking about that part of law 41B that allows for the declarer to ask questions before the opening lead is faced. It's not a case of "it's not useful to me", it's a case of "I didn't know I could do that" on the part of declarers, and of "I didn't know he could do that" on the part of defenders. So maybe "ignore" is not the best word for those people. But here we've been discussing it, everybody knows (or should know) what we've been discussing, and yet they say "if it doesn't happen, just ignore that".
There have been a couple of times I would have liked to ask something before the lead was faced, usually so I didn't forget the thought after dummy comes down and I have other things on my mind. However I was not given the chance to ask. To me, that's annoying as hell. Maybe I should have called the director and invoked Law 74A2.