BBO Discussion Forums: Quite high - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Quite high

#1 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2013-March-10, 04:26


IMPs.

What would you do?

If you double, you'd better tell us what it means too.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#2 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2013-March-10, 05:25

did I say support with support?, This time I don;t have it that clear as it is quite possible that 5 and 5 are both down, but I'd hate to let the bidding die without supporting with this.
0

#3 User is offline   paulg 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 5,082
  • Joined: 2003-April-26
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Scottish Borders

Posted 2013-March-10, 05:33

I think it's quite probable that both contracts are going down, but still will bid five hearts.
The Beer Card

I don't work for BBO and any advice is based on my BBO experience over the decades
0

#4 User is offline   MrAce 

  • VIP Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,971
  • Joined: 2009-November-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston, TX

Posted 2013-March-10, 05:43

I wish to know the stle of East player.

He did not open 5 , he obviously have better hand, or he probably found gold when his pd bid 1, or when my pd bid 2. I am not really sure if they are going down, hell i am not even pessimistic about our 5.

Put me down for 5
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"

"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."





0

#5 User is offline   dake50 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,211
  • Joined: 2006-April-22

Posted 2013-March-10, 07:52

Our auction blabbed HAQx winning for RHO.
And his S-Qxx is working.
Be glad he didn't hear his C-single/void makes 6D.
Let's not push them into that.
0

#6 User is offline   JLOGIC 

  • 2011 Poster of The Year winner
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,002
  • Joined: 2010-July-08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2013-March-10, 08:31

It's close but I think I would double (which I think is just penalty).
0

#7 User is offline   MrAce 

  • VIP Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,971
  • Joined: 2009-November-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston, TX

Posted 2013-March-10, 22:43

View PostJLOGIC, on 2013-March-10, 08:31, said:

It's close but I think I would double (which I think is just penalty).


What's your second choice Justin ?
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"

"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."





0

#8 User is offline   Siegmund 

  • Alchemist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,764
  • Joined: 2004-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Beside a little lake in northwestern Montana
  • Interests:Creator of the 'grbbridge' LaTeX typesetting package.

Posted 2013-March-11, 00:05

I would lead a club.

I think it's close between doubling and passing. MP would tilt me toward doubling.

I am not sure both contracts are down -- I've got enough hearts that my partner may not be winning a heart trick -- but anybody who thinks 5H has a prayer of making hasn't seen the hands my partners usually have for 2H in this spot. (Something like a chunky weak two seems to be a whole lot more common than the odd 15-pointer with 5 hearts.)
0

#9 User is offline   JLOGIC 

  • 2011 Poster of The Year winner
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,002
  • Joined: 2010-July-08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2013-March-11, 00:46

View PostMrAce, on 2013-March-10, 22:43, said:

What's your second choice Justin ?


5H, I would never pass personally...not in my DNA lol
0

#10 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2013-March-11, 06:36

Double would be penalty and I would choose it.
Kind Regards

Roland


Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

#11 User is offline   PhilKing 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,240
  • Joined: 2012-June-25

Posted 2013-March-11, 06:48

Who is righty? What methods do they play?

5 is a lot of diamonds. Righty is likely to have a partial spade fit otherwise it makes no sense - maybe 3?8? distribution. If lefty has 4 bidding is no bargain, but if he has 5 spades, partner is likely 1624 or 1633 (this one could lead to an overruff in diamonds), which could mean that BOTH contracts could make opposite the AK and the Q.

I've talked myself into 5.
0

#12 User is offline   Trinidad 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,531
  • Joined: 2005-October-09
  • Location:Netherlands

Posted 2013-March-11, 08:39

Put me down for 5. I think that both will go down (RHO could have bid 3, but didn't) but I will not take the risk that one of them will make.

Rik
I want my opponents to leave my table with a smile on their face and without matchpoints on their score card - in that order.
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
0

#13 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2013-March-11, 08:40

View PostPhilKing, on 2013-March-11, 06:48, said:

Who is righty? What methods do they play?

Nobody famous, playing Benjamin Acol.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#14 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2013-March-11, 08:46

Does anyone except me think that double should mean "I think we have a game-bonus to protect", rather than just being penalties?
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
1

#15 User is offline   paulg 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 5,082
  • Joined: 2003-April-26
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Scottish Borders

Posted 2013-March-11, 10:28

View Postgnasher, on 2013-March-11, 08:46, said:

Does anyone except me think that double should mean "I think we have a game-bonus to protect", rather than just being penalties?

I wonder if this distinction is too subtle to be useful when we have to make a five-level decision.
The Beer Card

I don't work for BBO and any advice is based on my BBO experience over the decades
0

#16 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2013-March-11, 14:30

View Postgnasher, on 2013-March-11, 08:46, said:

Does anyone except me think that double should mean "I think we have a game-bonus to protect", rather than just being penalties?


I can't speak for others, but I certainly don't want to play it that way. What you are saying is probably close to "I'd like to bid on unless you want to defend", but less constructively formulated. I would like to play this double for penalties though.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#17 User is offline   PhilKing 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,240
  • Joined: 2012-June-25

Posted 2013-March-11, 14:39

View Posthan, on 2013-March-11, 14:30, said:

I can't speak for others, but I certainly don't want to play it that way. What you are saying is probably close to "I'd like to bid on unless you want to defend", but less constructively formulated. I would like to play this double for penalties though.


I'm going to guess Andy plays it as an 79, where that reflects the percentage of the time partner will leave it in.
0

#18 User is offline   lalldonn 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,066
  • Joined: 2012-March-06

Posted 2013-March-11, 15:55

View Postgnasher, on 2013-March-11, 08:46, said:

Does anyone except me think that double should mean "I think we have a game-bonus to protect", rather than just being penalties?

How would you define the situation in which this agreement applies?
"What's the big rebid problem? After 1♦ - 1♠, I can rebid 1NT, 2♠, or 2♦."
- billw55
0

#19 User is offline   Phil 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,092
  • Joined: 2008-December-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Texas, USA
  • Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2013-March-11, 16:08

View Postlalldonn, on 2013-March-11, 15:55, said:

How would you define the situation in which this agreement applies?


It seems that it would apply when our side is suddenly jammed to a very high level and the person UTG hasn't had a chance to express that we have ownership (+) of the deck.
Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
0

#20 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2013-March-12, 01:22

But gnasher's double doesn't show ownership, it is an "almost ownership"-double.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

3 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users