BBO Discussion Forums: Multiple Choice - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Multiple Choice

Poll: Multiple Choice (14 member(s) have cast votes)

2C is natural non-forcing

  1. 3H (10 votes [71.43%])

    Percentage of vote: 71.43%

  2. 3S (fit) (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  3. 4H (1 votes [7.14%])

    Percentage of vote: 7.14%

  4. 2H (2 votes [14.29%])

    Percentage of vote: 14.29%

  5. 2S (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  6. Other (1 votes [7.14%])

    Percentage of vote: 7.14%

2C is natural and forcing

  1. 3H (10 votes [71.43%])

    Percentage of vote: 71.43%

  2. 3S (fit) (1 votes [7.14%])

    Percentage of vote: 7.14%

  3. 4H (1 votes [7.14%])

    Percentage of vote: 7.14%

  4. 2H (1 votes [7.14%])

    Percentage of vote: 7.14%

  5. 2S (1 votes [7.14%])

    Percentage of vote: 7.14%

  6. Other (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

2C shows 5+ diamonds, Invitational+

  1. 3H (8 votes [57.14%])

    Percentage of vote: 57.14%

  2. 3S (fit) (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  3. 4H (1 votes [7.14%])

    Percentage of vote: 7.14%

  4. 2H (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  5. 2S (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  6. Other (2 votes [14.29%])

    Percentage of vote: 14.29%

  7. 3D (mixed) raise (3 votes [21.43%])

    Percentage of vote: 21.43%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   FrancesHinden 

  • Limit bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,482
  • Joined: 2004-November-02
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Bridge, classical music, skiing... but I spend more time earning a living than doing any of those

Posted 2012-November-18, 10:05



1C is Polish (either a weak NT, or any 18+, or various hands with clubs)
You are playing with screens.
West isn't sure what 2C means... he alerts it, then thinks for a long time, then comes up with one of the explanations in the poll questions.

What do you bid under each scenario?
1

#2 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2012-November-18, 10:14

I'd bid 3H in all scenarios. The opponents are not certain about their methods so I want to take up as much room as possible. Of course I would like a spade lead but not supporting partner is not an option. And 3S is too much.

I would bid 3D if we play that as a mixed raise, but since it is not listed among the options I assume that it is not. I like the method very much though, I think that it is more useful than a fit jump.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#3 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2012-November-18, 10:35

View Posthan, on 2012-November-18, 10:14, said:

I would bid 3D if we play that as a mixed raise, but since it is not listed among the options I assume that it is not. I like the method very much though, I think that it is more useful than a fit jump.

That was my "other" in the 3rd case ---where we have 2D for an inv+ heart raise and 3D for the mixed one. In the other two scenarios, we haven't considered using 3D for that; but we might, now :rolleyes:
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#4 User is offline   FrancesHinden 

  • Limit bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,482
  • Joined: 2004-November-02
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Bridge, classical music, skiing... but I spend more time earning a living than doing any of those

Posted 2012-November-18, 10:43

I've added another option to the third question to allow 3D as a mixed raise (which is what we play under those conditions)
0

#5 User is offline   Trinidad 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,531
  • Joined: 2005-October-09
  • Location:Netherlands

Posted 2012-November-18, 12:50

I would bid a mixed raise, whatever that bid is in your system. For me that would be 2NT if 2 shows clubs and 3 if it shows clubs.

If there is no conventional mixed raise available I assume that 3 includes the mixed raise.

Rik
I want my opponents to leave my table with a smile on their face and without matchpoints on their score card - in that order.
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
0

#6 User is offline   PhilKing 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,240
  • Joined: 2012-June-25

Posted 2012-November-18, 18:41

Great question.

In options 1 and 3, there is a significant chance they are having a monumental screw up. I think the way of maximising the chance that they hang themselves is to pass.

It comes down to table feel. Passing is sick, but if I think they are heading off a cliff, then passing is right. Bidding lets them off the hook.
0

#7 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2012-November-19, 04:55

I think I am too strong on the first scenario for 3, I would bid mixed raise if avaible, 2 becuase it is not.
0

#8 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2012-November-19, 05:06

I tried to think of reasons to vary my action, but in the end I just decided to bid 4 on all of them. If they're having a misunderstanding, I'd prefer them to have it at the five-level.

I thought about 3 in all three sequences, but I don't really want partner to go to the five-level when I have such poor trumps.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users