I consider North's 3♥ an overbid, other than that I can't make sense of this auction.
Page 1 of 1
seeing is believing?
#1
Posted 2012-April-17, 17:24
I consider North's 3♥ an overbid, other than that I can't make sense of this auction.
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." MikeH
#2
Posted 2012-April-17, 18:34
Agree. The auction is fine up to and including West's 2♠ bid. North should now pass and allow partner to compete, and I don't know why West is bidding 3♠
A perfection of means, and confusion of aims, seems to be our main problem Albert Einstein
#4
Posted 2012-April-17, 21:27
North and West should sit across from each other. They wouldn't even need to fill out a convention card.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
#5
Posted 2012-April-18, 00:53
#6
Posted 2012-April-18, 01:06
aguahombre, on 2012-April-17, 21:27, said:
North and West should sit across from each other. They wouldn't even need to fill out a convention card.
nigel_k, on 2012-April-18, 00:53, said:
And their opponents could get by just filling out the section on doubles.
Haha
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." MikeH
Page 1 of 1