passable or cue?
#1
Posted 2012-April-12, 10:48
1H-2D
3D-3S (Edit: changed typo 2D to 3D)
3NT-4H
1H=5+cH
2D=4+cD; 10+
3D=4+cD; Does not promise extra's
What is 4H?:
- Proposal to play if opener is min with pnts in C (e.g.: 4351 with slam interest)
- Cue for D
#2
Posted 2012-April-12, 11:08
ahydra
#3
Posted 2012-April-12, 12:21
(That was what South told me)
#4
Posted 2012-April-12, 12:26
- billw55
#5
Posted 2012-April-12, 12:36
lalldonn, on 2012-April-12, 12:26, said:
I didn't get support at the bar. Happy I get it her from our star . I thought that 4♥ as control for ♦ was very unlikely (Why not 4♣ or 4♦ then?) and I thought that 4♥ was passable. ("some" support from you because I didn't think it showed a 2c♥).
#6
Posted 2012-April-12, 14:28
kgr, on 2012-April-12, 10:48, said:
1H-2D
2D-3S
3NT-4H
1H=5+cH
2D=4+cD; 10+
3D=4+cD; Does not promise extra's
What is 4H?:
- Proposal to play if opener is min with pnts in C (e.g.: 4351 with slam interest)
- Cue for D
How long have you been at the bar?
What is 3S after the insufficient 2D?
#7
Posted 2012-April-12, 16:05
#8
Posted 2012-April-12, 20:19
I remember a bunch of posts in the past where jdonn played a whole lot of 4M bids as non-forcing slam invitations / encouraging COGs where it wouldn't have occurred to me to do it that way. It makes quite a bit of sense here, but isn't what I'd assume without discussion.
#9
Posted 2012-April-19, 08:14
#10
Posted 2012-April-19, 23:12
Zelandakh, on 2012-April-19, 08:14, said:
If I had agreed ♥ with a 3♥ rebid, I would think my 4♥ a game suggestion.
I assume you meant that after the original auction 4♥ would be defined as you stated.
#11
Posted 2012-April-20, 00:50
BillPatch, on 2012-April-19, 23:12, said:
That is correct. I was answering the two points raised by the OP, that he did not know what a 3♥ rebid would have been and what 4♥ should be on the 3rd round. As far as I am aware the auction 1♥ - 2♦; 3♦ - 3♥; 4♥ was never raised but yes, I would agree with your interpretation of it, a minimum opener unexcited by the double-fit.