Help
ATB for missing slam?
Page 1 of 1
Who should do more?
#1
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 285
- Joined: 2010-December-19
- Gender:Male
- Location:England
- Interests:Walking, Climbing, Mathematics, Programming, Linux, Reading, Bridge.
Posted 2012-April-13, 04:03
ATB for missing slam?
#2
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 10,728
- Joined: 2003-March-07
- Gender:Male
- Location:Laos
- Interests:Wagner and Bridge
Posted 2012-April-13, 04:19
I don't understand 3D. Why not 3C and you might get there?
By the way that vulnerable 2D overcall is something else again.
By the way that vulnerable 2D overcall is something else again.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
#3
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 3,092
- Joined: 2005-June-27
Posted 2012-April-13, 04:31
the hog, on 2012-April-13, 04:19, said:
I don't understand 3D. Why not 3C and you might get there?
By the way that vulnerable 2D overcall is something else again.
By the way that vulnerable 2D overcall is something else again.
Presumably a simple preference to opener's first suit would not have been forcing. Why should it be?
By the way, would you have asked "ATB for reaching slam?" when North would have turned up with the ♥Q?
Slam is little better than 30%.
Rainer Herrmann
#4
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 94
- Joined: 2008-April-05
Posted 2012-April-13, 05:23
Presumably 3♣ is not forcing, West is forced to bid 3♦. In that case, 3♥ shows a fragment and should not set suit. After East shows 4-3-1-5 and extras, West should try for slam for the good-working high card points and fit.
I am not sure if West bid 4♣, taking it as setting ♣ suit as trumps or a cuebid setting ♥ as trumps. I prefer the former style, preserving 3♠ and 4♦ as slam-try in hearts. In the former case, 4♥ is a cuebid and East should proceed with 4♠. In the latter case, 4♥ is a signoff. However, from West's point of view, East should at least have AKXX QX XX AQJXX, or AKXX XXX X AQJXX for his 2♠ bid, so he should make a bid to find out the crucial ♦ control from partner.
I am not sure if West bid 4♣, taking it as setting ♣ suit as trumps or a cuebid setting ♥ as trumps. I prefer the former style, preserving 3♠ and 4♦ as slam-try in hearts. In the former case, 4♥ is a cuebid and East should proceed with 4♠. In the latter case, 4♥ is a signoff. However, from West's point of view, East should at least have AKXX QX XX AQJXX, or AKXX XXX X AQJXX for his 2♠ bid, so he should make a bid to find out the crucial ♦ control from partner.
#5
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 16,793
- Joined: 2003-October-07
- Gender:Male
Posted 2012-April-13, 06:32
Quartic, on 2012-April-13, 04:03, said:
ATB for missing slam?
no blame
support x over 2d then 4h by west then rkc by east gets you to 5h missing QH and a keycard.
#6
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 14,178
- Joined: 2009-July-13
- Location:England
Posted 2012-April-13, 06:38
♦
This is about a 50% slam, do you really want to be in it ? and RKC doesn't get you there, you find out you're missing an A and the Q trumps (as you noticed when you edited your post).
Would be really tricky if for some reason 6♣ was lots better but it isn't.
mike777, on 2012-April-13, 06:32, said:
support x over 2d then 4h by west then rkc by east gets you there.
This is about a 50% slam, do you really want to be in it ? and RKC doesn't get you there, you find out you're missing an A and the Q trumps (as you noticed when you edited your post).
Would be really tricky if for some reason 6♣ was lots better but it isn't.
#7
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 3,092
- Joined: 2005-June-27
Posted 2012-April-13, 11:47
Cyberyeti, on 2012-April-13, 06:38, said:
...
This is about a 50% slam...
This is about a 50% slam...
Tell us how you get to 50% after 2 rounds of diamonds.
Rainer Herrmann
#8
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 10,092
- Joined: 2008-December-11
- Gender:Male
- Location:North Texas, USA
- Interests:Mountain Biking
Posted 2012-April-13, 11:49
rhm, on 2012-April-13, 11:47, said:
Tell us how you get to 50% after 2 rounds of diamonds.
Rainer Herrmann
Rainer Herrmann
I think he answered his own question about a tricky reason why 6♣ is better.
Hi y'all!
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#9
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 14,178
- Joined: 2009-July-13
- Location:England
Posted 2012-April-13, 12:03
rhm, on 2012-April-13, 11:47, said:
Tell us how you get to 50% after 2 rounds of diamonds.
Rainer Herrmann
Rainer Herrmann
Scooped by Phil, I play in 6♣, yes 6♥ is about 40% on 2 rounds of diamonds, but my point about not wanting to be in the slam stands.
But practically I play in 5♥.
#10
- VIP Member
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 6,971
- Joined: 2009-November-14
- Gender:Male
- Location:Houston, TX
Posted 2012-April-13, 12:33
What i dont understand is 2♠ bid.
If they are using support DBL then he has support. If they don't play support DBL but take out DBL he has a very good hand for this. All his hcps are in his suits, shortness in opponent suit and 3 card fit to partner. I would take 2♠ as a hand that can play 3♣ if pd can not support ♠.
If they are using support DBL then he has support. If they don't play support DBL but take out DBL he has a very good hand for this. All his hcps are in his suits, shortness in opponent suit and 3 card fit to partner. I would take 2♠ as a hand that can play 3♣ if pd can not support ♠.
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#11
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 10,728
- Joined: 2003-March-07
- Gender:Male
- Location:Laos
- Interests:Wagner and Bridge
Posted 2012-April-14, 04:28
rhm, on 2012-April-13, 04:31, said:
Presumably a simple preference to opener's first suit would not have been forcing. Why should it be?
By the way, would you have asked "ATB for reaching slam?" when North would have turned up with the ♥Q?
Slam is little better than 30%.
Rainer Herrmann
By the way, would you have asked "ATB for reaching slam?" when North would have turned up with the ♥Q?
Slam is little better than 30%.
Rainer Herrmann
Of course it should be forcing. Opener has reversed. With a non forcing bid they should go via 2NT.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
#12
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 4,942
- Joined: 2005-January-28
- Gender:Male
- Location:Cologne, Germany
- Interests:Sleeping, Eating
Posted 2012-April-14, 11:24
MrAce, on 2012-April-13, 12:33, said:
If they are using support DBL then he has support. If they don't play support DBL but take out DBL he has a very good hand for this.
Agree 100%.
"One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision"
-- Bertrand Russell
-- Bertrand Russell
Page 1 of 1