BBO Discussion Forums: partner jump shifts making our hand a big monster - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

partner jump shifts making our hand a big monster

#1 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2012-March-11, 07:04

Yesterday I had 2 similar hands playing in the local club:

AJ109753
-
2
QJ963


1-1
3-??




AQJ984
QJ64
-
1063


1-1
3
0

#2 User is offline   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,152
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2012-March-11, 07:59

First hand, is the jump shift GF for you ? If so, just bid 4 as although 5 is exclusion, it doesn't give you space to untangle the spade holding opposite.

Second hand, don't have this problem, can bid 2 first time. Say 1-2(single suited and huge, or GF, 5 good , 4 decent )-3-5(agreeing , exclusion), if partner has x, AKxxx, AKQJx, xx, tough). 5N to find K if all keycards held as partner will bid 5 with 3.
0

#3 User is offline   TWO4BRIDGE 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,247
  • Joined: 2010-October-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Texas

Posted 2012-March-11, 08:44

View PostFluffy, on 2012-March-11, 07:04, said:

AQJ984
QJ64
-
1063

The 2nd hand, we could use Zelandakh's splinter system:

1H - 3S! ( void splinter somewhere )
3NT! ( asks ) - 4D! ( - void )
Don Stenmark
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall

" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh

K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
0

#4 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2012-March-11, 09:01

1. A practical 4NT for me. If pard has 0-3 keys, bid a conservative 6. If he shows 1-4 instead, go for the ambitious 7.

2. In french style, this is a 3 wtp?
0

#5 User is offline   nigel_k 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,207
  • Joined: 2009-April-26
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wellington, NZ

Posted 2012-March-11, 12:55

4 on the first and 3 on the second.

There will be hard decisions later but I don't see much we can do on this round to avoid that.
1

#6 User is offline   ahydra 

  • AQT92 AQ --- QJ6532
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,840
  • Joined: 2009-September-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wellington, NZ

Posted 2012-March-11, 16:33

4C on the first. On the second one I'll bid 4D over 1H - support with support, etc.

ahydra
0

#7 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2012-March-11, 18:22

I bid 4 and 3 the continuations should be:

1-1
3-4
4



1-1
3-3
4


what next?
0

#8 User is offline   Statto 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 636
  • Joined: 2011-December-01
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:UK
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, but not in conflation.
    Statistics, but not massaged by the media.

Posted 2012-March-11, 18:48

I'd rebid 3 on the 1st hoping to show the support later.

On the follow-ups, 4 cue with both, though on the 2nd I'm concerned about losers so might sign off in 4, and definitely would if playing Italian cues.
A perfection of means, and confusion of aims, seems to be our main problem – Albert Einstein
0

#9 User is offline   bigbenvic 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 317
  • Joined: 2011-October-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Melbourne, Australia

Posted 2012-March-12, 19:17

4 on the first - could 3 be 3 a card suit? if yes this should show 5, lucky I have 5 then!

3 on the second.

Set trumps on both and lets go exploring for slams :-)
0

#10 User is offline   TWO4BRIDGE 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,247
  • Joined: 2010-October-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Texas

Posted 2012-March-13, 07:54

View PostFluffy, on 2012-March-11, 07:04, said:

AJ109753
-
2
QJ963


1-1
3-??


On the 1st one :
4D ... Ctrl cue showing support for Opener's 2nd suit ( ) .
Don Stenmark
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall

" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh

K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
0

#11 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2012-March-14, 02:14

There is a problem with 4 o the first one.

You can never find out that partner has x or xx, this has 2 issues, first that you cannot know if 7 can be made, and second is that you cannot play 6 instead of 6 at MPs.

I tried 4 and ended up in 6, partner had xx AQxxx A AK10xx, KQ was stiff behind so 6 might or might not make



Second one was just for fun, partner had - AKxxxx AKxxx Jx Opening leader has AQx, and on my local 80% of the 20 table field bid and made 6 on a non club lead, wich is ludicrous not only because nobody found lack of club control nor led a club, but also because 13 tricks are easy if you manage dummy's entries enough.

Showing controls etc and getting a club lead due to it for +450 was worth 5% of the MPs.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users