No, we don't play lebensohl here. Would that have helped?
Is this game reachable? After opps bid so much...
#1
Posted 2012-March-05, 04:50
No, we don't play lebensohl here. Would that have helped?
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#2
Posted 2012-March-05, 04:56
George Carlin
#3
Posted 2012-March-05, 08:04
1. I missed a game where I need the 6. diamond, the heart ruff and the club finesse. Hard to bid with confidence.
2. As East, I have the worst possible heart holding. There is no law to forbid partner to hold a third heart or just three diamonds. In both cases, game is impossible or unlikely.
Of course BOTH players could had have a more optimistic view, but I would not fault anybody.
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#4
Posted 2012-March-05, 11:28
I think E focused too much on his hcp weakness and not on how good his hand was compared to what it might have been.
He might have held 2=4=4=3 shape, and yet his partner, knowing that such was possible, forced to the 4 level and made a strong plea that East bid game with any excuse. East had ample excuse.
#5
Posted 2012-March-05, 13:20
mikeh, on 2012-March-05, 11:28, said:
Why?
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#6
Posted 2012-March-05, 13:27
#7
Posted 2012-March-05, 14:08
Codo, on 2012-March-05, 13:20, said:
I could start with the fact that partner doubled hearts for takeout twice
I can then move on to a suggestion that you try constructing hands, consistent with the auction, in which partner, having seen you pass 1♠, and having heard you forced to bid 3♦ (assuming no lebensohl inferences available....most would play 2N as grope, I think, not lebensohl), then forced you to the 4 level while imploring you to bid game with any excuse.
Be aware, when constructing hands, that most of us tend to think of hands that justify our view....here, for you the temptation would be to find hands containing xxx in hearts, whereas for me, the temptation would be to find stiffs or very strong hands with xx.
#8
Posted 2012-March-05, 14:24
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#9
Posted 2012-March-05, 15:11
Hanoi5, on 2012-March-05, 04:50, said:
No, we don't play lebensohl here. Would that have helped?
Yes. West bid fine. But east has so much more than he needed to have, so he clearly is worth 5♦ over 3♥.
If I was east i would only think about how bad my hand could have been, and then 5♦ should be pretty easy to bid.
#10
Posted 2012-March-05, 17:35