BBO Discussion Forums: 2/1 BWS 2001 Defaults - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2/1 BWS 2001 Defaults Stayman follow up

#21 User is offline   Lurpoa 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 324
  • Joined: 2010-November-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cogitatio 40
  • Interests:SEF
    BBOAdvanced2/1
    2/1 LC
    Benjamized Acol
    Joris Acol
    Fantunes
    George's K Squeeze

Posted 2011-May-09, 06:50

View Postaguahombre, on 2011-May-08, 07:58, said:

Answered, starting with Gnasher.





Yes, tu; THEY did.
♥Bob Herreman ♥
0

#22 User is offline   peachy 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,056
  • Joined: 2007-November-19
  • Location:Pacific Time

Posted 2011-May-09, 06:55

Quote

- - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - -
In other words, anytime Responder bids 3m-after-Stayman( and Opener's reply), he DOES promise a four-card Major.


Still on SAYC:
To show clubs ONLY
1NT-3C = invite
1NT-2S(relay)3C = weak
1NT-2C-2whatever-3C = slam invite

How else (still by SAYC) are you going to bid a slam zone hand with a minor but no 4-card major?

I am not trying to say this is best, but it "is" what SAYC prescibes.
0
  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

4 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users

  1. Facebook