Posted 2009-December-14, 03:55
I don't understand the hate for the support double. In competition, the side that first understands how high they should bid has a huge advantage -- they can bid to their level or slightly over it and let the opponents guess. By support doubling, we put partner in the driver's seat first -- West still has to clarify to East how many hearts he has, and East may have extra undisclosed heart length.
True, a support double does not guarantee a good result. But for every time a support double backfires, I can think of multiple auctions where communicating to partner that you hold 3-card support for his major helps you with the contested part-score auction. And here, you are void in the enemy suit, so you would much rather encourage partner to bid than to pass. The hands where I don't support double with 3 are those with soft cards in the enemy suit & bad shape & bad trumps, where we really don't want to be encouraging partner to bid. Just xxx is not enough of a deterrent for me -- the number of trumps is far more important than their strength in what looks to be a LAW auction.
Once partner makes an informed pass over 3♥, I am not even tempted to bid 4♥. He knows our 3 spades, he knows our best suit, he knows our values, he can probably discern our shortness from the bidding, and he still has the opportunity to bid 4♠ or double himself. Doubling is similarly misguided -- we have exactly what we have bid, and nothing more. Given a capable partner, there is no call here to do anything but pass.
Eugene Hung
You deal:
1♦-(P)-1♠-(2♥)
X*-(3♥)-P-(4♥)
?