BBO Discussion Forums: Implied? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Implied?

#1 User is offline   mtvesuvius 

  • Vesuvius the Violent Volcano
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,216
  • Joined: 2008-December-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tampa-Area, Florida
  • Interests:SLEEPING

Posted 2009-December-12, 15:36

Scoring: IMP

You deal:
1-(P)-1-(2)
X*-(3)-P-(4)
?


*Support
Your call?

EDIT: What about at MPs?
Yay for the "Ignored Users" feature!
0

#2 User is offline   Jlall 

  • Follower of 655321
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,293
  • Joined: 2008-December-05
  • Interests:drinking, women, bridge...what else?

Posted 2009-December-12, 15:39

pass?!
0

#3 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2009-December-12, 16:31

Jlall, on Dec 12 2009, 04:39 PM, said:

pass?!

I mean, there's double and redouble. Maybe this situation calls for repass? Twice as much a pass as usual?
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#4 User is offline   neilkaz 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,568
  • Joined: 2006-June-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Barrington IL USA
  • Interests:Backgammon, Bridge, Hockey

Posted 2009-December-12, 17:18

I pass. PD heard me open and heard my supX. I do have decent ODR but I still pass and hope to set, rather than 4.
0

#5 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2009-December-12, 17:34

The title: "Implied"? scares me into thinking you would try 4S now because it implies 3 0 5 5. Maybe it does, but Pass implies I don't want to bid.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#6 User is offline   andy_h 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,962
  • Joined: 2007-September-14
  • Location:Australia
  • Interests:The Universe, Traveling, Squash, and Scandinavia.

Posted 2009-December-12, 19:35

Pass
- Andy -

We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
0

#7 User is offline   Phil 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,093
  • Joined: 2008-December-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Texas, USA
  • Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2009-December-13, 09:27

Does 'implied' mean that because partner isn't 4-4 in the majors that they either have a 10 card fit, or we have 8 spades?

Neat idea, but we don't have a clue to partner's diamond length, which is the key to our offensive / defensive potential.

Can you blame pard for getting angry about playing 4 x'd holding: Qxxxx, JTx, x, Axxx? With a diamond fit along with 8 spades (QJxxx, xxx, xxxx, A for instance, which is about the best kind kind of hand you can hope for), I think pard bids 3/3.
Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
0

#8 User is offline   mikeh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,728
  • Joined: 2005-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
  • Interests:Bridge, golf, wine (red), cooking, reading eclectically but insatiably, travelling, making bad posts.

Posted 2009-December-13, 12:38

Even thinking of a call other than pass is a huge overbid
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
0

#9 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2009-December-13, 15:16

gawd I hatr supp doubles.... Pard is very likely to have some 7-8 hcp with a 5-4 majors.

I think I double.
0

#10 User is offline   Siegmund 

  • Alchemist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,764
  • Joined: 2004-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Beside a little lake in northwestern Montana
  • Interests:Creator of the 'grbbridge' LaTeX typesetting package.

Posted 2009-December-13, 21:01

Even playing support doubles I don't think I am doubling at my 2nd turn here. I will be happier passing at my 3rd turn after showing both my suits - and if I decide I am not happy passing at my 3rd turn I can at least have a cheap spade rebid available.

(Actually with my regular p I have an agreement that a support double promises Qxx+, never xxx/Jxx. Sort of halfway between support and Rosenkranz.)
0

#11 User is offline   eyhung 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 345
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Location:San Jose, CA
  • Interests:bridge, poker, literature, boardgames, computers, classical music, baseball, history

Posted 2009-December-14, 03:55

I don't understand the hate for the support double. In competition, the side that first understands how high they should bid has a huge advantage -- they can bid to their level or slightly over it and let the opponents guess. By support doubling, we put partner in the driver's seat first -- West still has to clarify to East how many hearts he has, and East may have extra undisclosed heart length.

True, a support double does not guarantee a good result. But for every time a support double backfires, I can think of multiple auctions where communicating to partner that you hold 3-card support for his major helps you with the contested part-score auction. And here, you are void in the enemy suit, so you would much rather encourage partner to bid than to pass. The hands where I don't support double with 3 are those with soft cards in the enemy suit & bad shape & bad trumps, where we really don't want to be encouraging partner to bid. Just xxx is not enough of a deterrent for me -- the number of trumps is far more important than their strength in what looks to be a LAW auction.

Once partner makes an informed pass over 3, I am not even tempted to bid 4. He knows our 3 spades, he knows our best suit, he knows our values, he can probably discern our shortness from the bidding, and he still has the opportunity to bid 4 or double himself. Doubling is similarly misguided -- we have exactly what we have bid, and nothing more. Given a capable partner, there is no call here to do anything but pass.
Eugene Hung
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users