BBO Discussion Forums: Uninteresting evaluation question - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Uninteresting evaluation question

#1 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2009-November-06, 08:55

Scoring: IMP

RHO passes. What do you open? If you open 1♣, what do you plan to rebid?

A 2NT opening would show 20-22.

This post has been edited by gnasher: 2009-November-06, 09:04

... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#2 User is offline   pooltuna 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,814
  • Joined: 2009-July-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Orleans

Posted 2009-November-06, 09:04

gnasher, on Nov 6 2009, 09:55 AM, said:

Scoring: IMP

RHO passes. What do you open? If you open 1♣, what do you plan to rebid?

2NT would show 20-22.

you mean in your system a 2NT rebid shows 20-22? with 8 controls I rebid that anyway.
"Tell me of your home world, Usul"
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"

"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."

George Bernard Shaw
0

#3 User is offline   billw55 

  • enigmatic
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,757
  • Joined: 2009-July-31
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2009-November-06, 09:15

I think he means, would we open it 2NT, 20-22. I would.
Life is long and beautiful, if bad things happen, good things will follow.
-gwnn
0

#4 User is offline   Trinidad 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,531
  • Joined: 2005-October-09
  • Location:Netherlands

Posted 2009-November-06, 09:24

I would plan to rebid 2♦. But what would I do with my plan if partner responds 1♦? (I might "splinter" 3♥.)

Rik
I want my opponents to leave my table with a smile on their face and without matchpoints on their score card - in that order.
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
0

#5 User is offline   Jlall 

  • Follower of 655321
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,293
  • Joined: 2008-December-05
  • Interests:drinking, women, bridge...what else?

Posted 2009-November-06, 10:03

I'd open 2N
0

#6 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,361
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Interests:History, languages

Posted 2009-November-06, 10:35

I open 1♣, if p bids 1♠ I rebid 2♦, if he bids 1♥ I rebid 2NT. If he bids 1♦ it's nice to have 2♦ as a forcing raise, but otherwise I rebid 2NT.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

#7 User is offline   OleBerg 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,950
  • Joined: 2008-April-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Copenhagen
  • Interests:Model-Railways.

Posted 2009-November-06, 10:52

The beaten path.

1♣ followed by a reverse. Should partner reply 1♦ I will "naturally" have the agreement that both 2♥ and 2♠ are artificial, one of them containing a strong hand with diamond support.
_____________________________________

Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.

Best Regards Ole Berg

_____________________________________

We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:

- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.

Gnasher
0

#8 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2009-November-06, 10:56

2NT keep it simple. Though I'm not at all a fan of a 3 point opening 2NT range.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#9 User is offline   Phil 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,092
  • Joined: 2008-December-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Texas, USA
  • Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2009-November-06, 11:01

Agree with 2N, in spite of the upgrading junkies around here.

We have 2 more controls than usual, AK9xx and a married 10. I think this is just enough to upgrade.

However, I don't object to 1♣ - 1M - 2N. I hate 1♣ - reverse, since more than half of my points are in my short suits.
Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
0

#10 User is offline   mikeh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,314
  • Joined: 2005-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
  • Interests:Bridge, golf, wine (red), cooking, reading eclectically but insatiably, travelling, making bad posts.

Posted 2009-November-06, 11:04

I'd open 2N, but would be far more comfortable doing so if our range was 20-21. As it is, I think it extremely close, and would not criticize any partner for choosing 1♣. I would think such a partner to be overly timid if our range was 20-21.

While having 11/19 of our hcp in our short suits is bad, we do have 8, count them, 8 control! We will not often hold that many in a balanced 20 count. And we have a 5 card suit headed by the AK and no worries (for 3N) about our weakest suit.

So I upgrade.
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
0

#11 User is offline   billw55 

  • enigmatic
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,757
  • Joined: 2009-July-31
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2009-November-06, 13:07

I think upgrading the value is clear. The only reason not to choose 2NT is the shape, which is reasonable and a matter of taste.

We know aces are worth more than 4, and an AK combination is certainly worth more than 7 (the K is just as good as the A). Here also is a decent 5 card suit, a touching ten, and possibly a working 9 and 8. I would rate this hand as ~22 points value even before any fit.

Maybe I am just one of those "upgrade junkies" Phil is talking about :P
Life is long and beautiful, if bad things happen, good things will follow.
-gwnn
0

#12 User is offline   Apollo81 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,162
  • Joined: 2006-July-10
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maryland

Posted 2009-November-06, 13:24

I would open 1♣ and reverse, thereby avoiding 2NT when partner has a flattish hand with very few hcp.
0

#13 User is offline   EricK 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,303
  • Joined: 2003-February-14
  • Location:England

Posted 2009-November-06, 13:36

I would simply open 1♣. I like to look for reasons to upgrade to 1NT but I hate auctions which start 2NT so I am far more reluctant to upgrade at that level.

Do I have a hand which would benefit from being declarer in NT? Not particularly
Is my natural suit bid a good suit I feel happy mentioning? Yes
Will I be able to express my strength if I choose the suit opening? Probably

Clearly there are bad things which might happen if we choose 1♣ - we could get passed out when we have a game on, or the opponents might be able to get a cheap bid or two in, and disrupt us. But equally there are bad things which could happen after 2NT - we could miss 6♣, or partner with 55 in the majors might insist on one of his suits thinking we must have a fit.

So all things considered, I don't see the need to upgrade here.
0

#14 User is offline   dellache 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 345
  • Joined: 2003-October-13
  • Location:Paris - France
  • Interests:Children, family, job. Then a few minutes remain to play Bridge.<br>

Posted 2009-November-06, 13:55

I don't know. I think the hand is worth an upgrade for 2NT, but I fear we may miss 6m, and the (my) system over 2NT sucks for that, when pard will obviously start by looking for some Major suit. Also, if pard bids 1NT/1♣ with ♥Qxx, he will receive the lead if we happen to play NT from his hand but it's actually a very minor concern. I don't care if pard bid 4♦ (5-5MM) over 2NT, BTW.

So I may open 1♣ and reverse 2♦, or open 2NT. It will really depend on my mood.
The only thing I wouldn't do is open 1♣ and rebid 2NT, that would be underbiding imo.
FD
0

#15 User is offline   dake50 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,211
  • Joined: 2006-April-22

Posted 2009-November-06, 14:35

Open 1D intending Jump shift 3C over 1M. Get my lead inhibitor in cheaply.
0

#16 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2009-November-06, 14:36

I open 1♣ and rebid 2♦ over a response of 1♥, 1♠ or 1NT.

At IMPs, I want to show both my strength and my distribution. I want to get to a minor suit slam if it is there, and a minor suit game if it is better than 3NT.

The chance of getting to 5 or 6 of a minor when it is right after opening 2NT is very small.

At matchpoints, there is more to be said for opening 2NT.
0

#17 User is offline   billw55 

  • enigmatic
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,757
  • Joined: 2009-July-31
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2009-November-06, 15:33

Just for fun I thought up the auction 1♣-3♥-p-p back to me. Now what? A little off topic but hey.
Life is long and beautiful, if bad things happen, good things will follow.
-gwnn
0

#18 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2009-November-06, 15:52

2NT. I'd open 2NT if the range was 21-22.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#19 User is offline   Jlall 

  • Follower of 655321
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,293
  • Joined: 2008-December-05
  • Interests:drinking, women, bridge...what else?

Posted 2009-November-06, 18:11

billw55, on Nov 6 2009, 04:33 PM, said:

Just for fun I thought up the auction 1♣-3♥-p-p back to me. Now what? A little off topic but hey.

3N lol
0

#20 User is offline   the hog 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-March-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Laos
  • Interests:Wagner and Bridge

Posted 2009-November-06, 18:29

1C followed by 2D.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
0
  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users