BBO Discussion Forums: 1NT Overcall Range requirement? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1NT Overcall Range requirement? 3 suited takeout overcall 1NT Range

#1 User is offline   A2003 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 312
  • Joined: 2005-December-16

Posted 2009-September-25, 16:01

General convention chart Link

One pair was playing West coast style overcall system
1NT overcall is 3 suited takeout promises 3 cards in unbid suit.
This is mentioned in the General convention chart. competitive section 3.b
Dbl is power double.

Range was 1NT overcall is 7-15HCP (3 suited Takeout).
Power dbl is 16+ range
This method was questioned by their opponents.

TD disallowed the NT overcall range.
TD mentioned the 1NT overcall range cannot be this wide.
TD also mentioned that this should be within 5 pt range.

Is the TD statement correct?

Second Question?
Is there a similar requirement in the sandwitch seat.
1minor pass 1 major 1NT pass

What should be 1NT range here when playing for unbid suit take out.
Is there a similar range requirement?


======================================================
From website of westcoast style overcall system:
3. The One No-trump Overcall for Takeout (NTO)

The centerpiece of the system. The NTO comes up frequently and creates problems for the opponents, while letting us know the suits in which we can compete. The NTO can be described as a light three-suited takeout, showing 3+ cards in each of the unbid suits and generally 6 -15 HCP. The bid implies a doubleton or less in the opener's suit, i.e., it should not be used with 4-3-3-3 hands. The bid is alertable.
3.1 Point count requirements

The sources differ in their description of the point count requirements. Spaulding gives the range as 4 to a bad 14, or up to a bad 15 opposite a passed partner. Fout says 6-15 at equal vulnerability. At the table Twineham and Hodges, at unfavorable vulnerability, said their range was 8-14.
0

#2 User is offline   Stephen Tu 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,151
  • Joined: 2003-May-14

Posted 2009-September-25, 16:12

TD incorrect IMO.
GCC:
3. NOTRUMP OVERCALL for either
a) two-suit takeout showing at least 5–4 distribution and at least one
known suit (At the four level or higher there is no requirement to have
a known suit.) or
:lol: three-suit takeout (at least three cards in each of the three suits.)

no mention of strength requirements.

For a natural notrump overcall, you can restrict conventional responses to a < 10 hcp or wide range call, but you can't prohibit the call itself.
0

#3 User is offline   Phil 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,093
  • Joined: 2008-December-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Texas, USA
  • Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2009-September-25, 16:15

West Coast stylz w00t.

I play this. It's legal. I try to pre-announce although I don't have to. 7-15 is typical.

I have no idea about the conventional responses to a 1NTO, but the responses are usually natural anyway.

The Director is out of line.
Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
0

#4 User is offline   mtvesuvius 

  • Vesuvius the Violent Volcano
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,216
  • Joined: 2008-December-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tampa-Area, Florida
  • Interests:SLEEPING

Posted 2009-September-25, 16:33

The director is treating the 1NT overcall as "Natural" and therefore needs to go back to class.
Yay for the "Ignored Users" feature!
0

#5 User is offline   matmat 

  • ded
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,459
  • Joined: 2005-August-11
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 2009-September-25, 17:12

mtvesuvius, on Sep 25 2009, 05:33 PM, said:

The director is treating the 1NT overcall as "Natural" and therefore needs to go back to class.

go directly to class
do not pass go!, do not collect TD fee.
0

#6 User is offline   mycroft 

  • Secretary Bird
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,303
  • Joined: 2003-July-12
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Calgary, D18; Chapala, D16

Posted 2009-September-28, 09:55

If it's in a club, the club can have whatever rules they want.

If it's advertised as a GCC game, however, your fallback is to (politely!) ask the TD to pull the GCC and show you - after which you can point out the difference between natural and three-suited NT overcalls on the paper.

(I'm an EHAA player - I Know From This).
Long live the Republic-k. -- Major General J. Golding Frederick (tSCoSI)
0

#7 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2009-September-28, 13:36

For a few years, I played something similar to this. We called it "RUNT," for "Really Unusual No Trump."

We also ran into this insane "range" limitation, which made no sense. So, we punished the director by inventing modified RUNT and "Son-of-RUNT."

The new 1NT range was 5-10 OR 19-23. We convinced them that the notrump range could be "five points" and that a "woodson two-way" meant that 1NT could have split ranges. This, of course, was nonsense, but I can play their game.

The result of the modified RUNT was to have "Son-of-RUNT." This meant that a double was defined as:

1. 0-4 and three-suited takeout, or
2. 11-18, three-suited takeout, or
3. 15+ balanced, or
4. big one-suiter, or
5. big two-suiter, or
6. 24+ three-suited takeout

Of course, they boxed themselves into this. I'd suggest that the West Coasters try unleashing this on the local TD's who make up rules and see just how quickly that nonsense rights itself.

BTW -- RUNT and Son-of-RUNT worked remarkably well. There was also another version of it, over a 1 opening, when a double could also show just clubs and overcall strength. A 2 overcall then showed clubs and a higher suit.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users