RIP Memoriam thread?
#401
Posted 2016-January-19, 11:08
What with Lemmy on bass/vocals, Frey on guitar and Bowie on vocals could be good.
#402
Posted 2016-January-26, 14:14
I think this is the first person in this thread who I knew personally, although not very well. When I was a freshman at MIT, I think I once went to a party at his home.
#403
Posted 2016-January-29, 23:03
#404
Posted 2016-February-09, 08:50
The infliction of cruelty with a good conscience is a delight to moralists — that is why they invented hell. — Bertrand Russell
#405
Posted 2016-February-13, 16:43
#406
Posted 2016-February-13, 18:13
#408
Posted 2016-February-13, 22:12
#409
Posted 2016-February-13, 22:38
jShocking and sad and yes many political factors but too soon.
#410
Posted 2016-February-14, 04:44
https://www.facebook...8926045/?type=3
with the comment
Quote
I think this sums the argument up fairly well.
#411
Posted 2016-February-14, 07:10
Scalia had no respect for precedence or stare decisis. In turn, this is why his own decisions are built on sand...
#412
Posted 2016-February-14, 11:02
hrothgar, on 2016-February-14, 07:10, said:
Hrothgar, I don't care whether his decisions were built on jello. The man just past away. IMNSHO, this is neither the place nor the time.
Rik
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
#413
Posted 2016-February-14, 11:14
Cyberyeti, on 2016-February-14, 04:44, said:
https://www.facebook...8926045/?type=3
with the comment
I think this sums the argument up fairly well.
For those who don't follow links, the quotation, attributed to Scalia, is: "Mere factual innocence is no reason not to carry out a death sentence properly reached."
Interesting that I cannot find any source for this supposed quotation, let alone a context for it. Some say a speech, but no one knows where or when. Maybe your friend can solve the problem?
Also interesting that the statement, whether Scalia's or imaginary, could reasonably turn up in a rarified discussion of the law of criminal appellate procedure and /or SCOTUS' responsibility to promulgate the FRCr.P.
#414
Posted 2016-February-14, 12:23
Flem72, on 2016-February-14, 11:14, said:
Interesting that I cannot find any source for this supposed quotation, let alone a context for it. Some say a speech, but no one knows where or when. Maybe your friend can solve the problem?
Also interesting that the statement, whether Scalia's or imaginary, could reasonably turn up in a rarified discussion of the law of criminal appellate procedure and /or SCOTUS' responsibility to promulgate the FRCr.P.
It looks like it's a paraphrasing of a longer judgment. To me having read the original, I think the paraphrasing is fair, but it could do with a bit of context.
#415
Posted 2016-February-14, 12:41
Flem72, on 2016-February-14, 11:14, said:
Interesting that I cannot find any source for this supposed quotation, let alone a context for it. Some say a speech, but no one knows where or when. Maybe your friend can solve the problem?
Also interesting that the statement, whether Scalia's or imaginary, could reasonably turn up in a rarified discussion of the law of criminal appellate procedure and /or SCOTUS' responsibility to promulgate the FRCr.P.
This is from the 1993 case Herrera v. Collins, and the actual text of Scalia's concurring opinion, provided by SCOTUS, can be found here: http://www.supremeco...lumes/506bv.pdf .
#416
Posted 2016-February-14, 12:43
kenberg, on 2016-February-13, 22:12, said:
I've moved the posts about SCOTUS, but not specifically about Scalia, to a new thread.
#417
Posted 2016-February-14, 14:31
Bbradley62, on 2016-February-14, 12:41, said:
ty
#418
Posted 2016-February-19, 12:11
#419
Posted 2016-February-19, 19:09