Page 1 of 1
Toxic!
#1
Posted 2008-September-27, 02:22
All red, Imps:
1♣ - (1NT) - ?
1♣ is 9-15 hcp and natural, or 9-12 hcp and balanced.
♠ -
♥AQ752
♦987654
♣T3
1♣ - (1NT) - ?
1♣ is 9-15 hcp and natural, or 9-12 hcp and balanced.
♠ -
♥AQ752
♦987654
♣T3
_____________________________________
Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.
Best Regards Ole Berg
_____________________________________
We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:
- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.
Gnasher
Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.
Best Regards Ole Berg
_____________________________________
We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:
- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.
Gnasher
#2
Posted 2008-September-27, 03:06
Please post hands in English. What the hell is a "E" and a "D"???
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
#3
Posted 2008-September-27, 03:46
2♥. It's very likely that partner will be on lead against a spade contract, and I'd greatly prefer a a heart lead. If I get a chance, I'll bid 3♦ on the next round.
This may work out badly if partner gives preference to 3♥ with 2-2 in the reds, but the opponents may well save us by competing to 3♠.
This may work out badly if partner gives preference to 3♥ with 2-2 in the reds, but the opponents may well save us by competing to 3♠.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
#4
Posted 2008-September-27, 04:04
OleBerg, on Sep 27 2008, 03:22 AM, said:
All red, Imps: ♠ - ♥AQ752 ♦ 987654 ♣ T3
1♣ (1NT) ?
1♣ is 9-15 hcp and natural, or 9-12 hcp and balanced.
1♣ (1NT) ?
1♣ is 9-15 hcp and natural, or 9-12 hcp and balanced.
IMO 2N (2-suiter) = 10, 2♥ = 9, 2♦ = 8, _P = 7.
#6
Posted 2008-September-27, 08:13
This hand is reason to play your weak NT defense after opps overcall with natural 1NT. That means I can show heart-minor 2-suiter with 2 hearts.
#7
Posted 2008-September-27, 12:48
Free, on Sep 27 2008, 04:06 AM, said:
Please post hands in English. What the hell is a "E" and a "D"??? 
May I suggest that you refrase this into:
"Excuse me, Ole, but my Scandinavian is not as good as your English. Could you please edit your post in this and the 'oops, I did it again' thread and replace the E, D, and B by the English symbols. Thanks!"
Probably Ole was just typing in the hands from a hand record (or a website) in his own language and forgot to translate the A/K/Q/J symbols. It can happen to the best of us. There is no need to use water cooler language for that (and certainly not to repeat it).
Keep
Rik
I want my opponents to leave my table with a smile on their face and without matchpoints on their score card - in that order.
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
#8
Posted 2008-September-28, 15:44
Hi,
There are players out there, who play system on,
i.e. they use the same bids as if the opponents
had opened 1NT.
Would be perfect now, and is certainly a sensible
agreement within the context of your system,
given that the 1C opening showes virtual nothing
besides holding a hand with 10HCP.
If all bids your bids are natural, I would pass.
With kind regards
Marlowe
There are players out there, who play system on,
i.e. they use the same bids as if the opponents
had opened 1NT.
Would be perfect now, and is certainly a sensible
agreement within the context of your system,
given that the 1C opening showes virtual nothing
besides holding a hand with 10HCP.
If all bids your bids are natural, I would pass.
With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#9
Posted 2008-September-28, 17:29
Haha Ole, you'll need to search hard to find someone with the same kind of imagination as you
.
Your choice would have worked better had you not had Michael the Wimp as partner....
Your choice would have worked better had you not had Michael the Wimp as partner....
Michael Askgaard
#10
Posted 2008-September-29, 00:49
MFA, on Sep 29 2008, 01:29 AM, said:
Haha Ole, you'll need to search hard to find someone with the same kind of imagination as you
.
Your choice would have worked better had you not had Michael the Wimp as partner....
Your choice would have worked better had you not had Michael the Wimp as partner....
Yes, I thought that MFA meant Mother-Fucking Askgaard, but it turned out to be MorFar Askgaard.
(By the way, as I remember it, it turned out ok.)
_____________________________________
Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.
Best Regards Ole Berg
_____________________________________
We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:
- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.
Gnasher
Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.
Best Regards Ole Berg
_____________________________________
We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:
- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.
Gnasher
Page 1 of 1

Help
