[whereagles]

The_Hog, on Jan 26 2008, 12:42 AM, said:

Why don't you add the following structure to your system Nuno?

Thanks. I'll give it a look.

[jdonn]

Halo, on Jan 25 2008, 07:25 PM, said:

So many of these posts we rabbit away and never find out what the hand was.

I want to know if I made my 6NT.

Will you feel better if everyone but you agrees it was the wrong bid but you made it anyway?

[Halo]

jdonn, on Jan 25 2008, 07:53 PM, said:

Halo, on Jan 25 2008, 07:25 PM, said:

So many of these posts we rabbit away and never find out what the hand was.

I want to know if I made my 6NT.

Will you feel better if everyone but you agrees it was the wrong bid but you made it anyway?

Everyone?

If I make 6NT and partner had what I thought he had, then I don't care what a few other people thought.

If partner's hand is completely different and I make a 10% slam, then I am not impressed by my success.

[jdonn]

Halo, on Jan 25 2008, 07:57 PM, said:

jdonn, on Jan 25 2008, 07:53 PM, said:

Halo, on Jan 25 2008, 07:25 PM, said:

So many of these posts we rabbit away and never find out what the hand was.

I want to know if I made my 6NT.

Will you feel better if everyone but you agrees it was the wrong bid but you made it anyway?

Everyone?

Yes, everyone who has offered an opinion on the matter, most of them quite strongly.

[whereagles]

Allright, here are the hands

♠ Q76
♥ AJ8543
♦ 8
♣ AJ6

♠ AJ2
♥ 9
♦ AKQT42
♣ K97

and you get to pick which contract you'd prefer to be in Best is probably 3NT or 6♦.

Me and pard ended up in 7♦(!!) after a mix-up, but the good news is LHO did "lead a trump vs grand slams" and that ate up his pard's ♦J9xx After the hearts were 3-3, the grand made... lol.

Anyway, thx all for your opinions. 4NT was indeed intended as quantitative, as most of you suggested. There isn't much sense in it being RKCB in a misfit, right?