Fourth Suit Predicament
#21
Posted 2006-October-30, 08:04
Anything which shows interest in a ♣ slam now. I think grand has some chances, so why just settle for small?
Since it's crossimps I might even go for 6NT or 7NT to pick up some small extra's
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
#22 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2006-October-30, 11:58
4N to play doesnt make much sense to me. Why didn't I bid 3 or 4N the round before?
#23
Posted 2006-October-30, 12:44
mikeh, on Oct 29 2006, 05:47 PM, said:
It is close between taking control via 4N (keycard) or cuebidding 4♦, intending to bid 5♥ over 4♠ and 6♣ over 5♣.
I prefer the latter approach because I expect that partner will be better positioned to make the small/grand decision after the cuebid approach than I will be after a keycard ask.
For those who like 4♦ as keycard, how do you bid with x QJxxx AKQx Axx?
Do you want to play 6♣ opposite AKQJx xx x KQJxx? You might well make it, but do you want to be there?
I prefer the latter approach because I expect that partner will be better positioned to make the small/grand decision after the cuebid approach than I will be after a keycard ask.
For those who like 4♦ as keycard, how do you bid with x QJxxx AKQx Axx?
Do you want to play 6♣ opposite AKQJx xx x KQJxx? You might well make it, but do you want to be there?
Yes, I bid 4d rkc and end up in 6clubs....not down yet.
#24
Posted 2006-October-30, 13:57
Jlall, on Oct 30 2006, 12:58 PM, said:
4N to play doesnt make much sense to me. Why didn't I bid 3 or 4N the round before?
Agree with Justin. Why would I bid 3D (4th suit) if I want to play 3N? 4D as RCK? what if I want to show 6-5 or even 6-6 (or 7-6)?
Senshu

Help
