BBO Discussion Forums: Bidding problem - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Bidding problem

#1 User is offline   twcho 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 327
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hong Kong

Posted 2006-June-07, 09:24

Scoring: IMP

How to reach the best contract? (I suppose to be 4)
0

#2 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2006-June-07, 09:30

I would have bid
1NT - 2NT ( Xfer)
3 (likes them) - 3 (shortness)
3NT ppp

Who knows, there is a decent chance they lead a heart from the queen on this auction.

I suppose 4 is best, probably, but there is not much to choose between that and 3NT if you ask me.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#3 User is offline   bid_em_up 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,351
  • Joined: 2006-March-21
  • Location:North Carolina

Posted 2006-June-07, 10:01

I'm not so certain that 4 is all that much better than 5.

Assume the defense starts with 3 rounds of clubs, you really cant afford to ruff in the long hand (unless you want to play for 3-3 spades), so you pitch from dummy and you're back in the same position you would be in if you were in 5 (having to guess the suit for no losers). And you will still lose 4 any time spades are 5-4-3-1 (or even worse 6-4-3-0) around the table.

5 only depends on picking up the suit. Since it is IMPs, not MP, my vote would go for being in 5. Thats easy enough to do.

1N 2N 3D (non-super accept) 3S 4H 5D
Is the word "pass" not in your vocabulary?
So many experts, not enough X cards.
0

#4 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,520
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2006-June-07, 10:08

I am sure I would bid the same as Josh. Bidding anything else but 3N over 3 might lead to the right game opposite a hand like this, but implies too much values for slam in case that is partner's interest (apart from leading to the wrong game opposite a hand with club values).

Arend
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

#5 User is offline   twcho 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 327
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hong Kong

Posted 2006-June-07, 10:34

Quote

Assume the defense starts with 3 rounds of clubs, you really cant afford to ruff in the long hand (unless you want to play for 3-3 spades), so you pitch from dummy and you're back in the same position you would be in if you were in 5 (having to guess the suit for no losers). And you will still lose 4 any time spades are 5-4-3-1 (or even worse 6-4-3-0) around the table.


I think u can ruff the 3rd with small trump and then cash A and play towards K, if the shortness is with LHO, then he rates to have longer trumps and he will gain nothing in ruffing so he has to duck the . After scoring two tricks, it is not difficult to come to 10 tricks by cross ruffing then.
0

#6 User is offline   bid_em_up 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,351
  • Joined: 2006-March-21
  • Location:North Carolina

Posted 2006-June-07, 14:37

deleted
Is the word "pass" not in your vocabulary?
So many experts, not enough X cards.
0

#7 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2006-June-08, 00:55

I would reach 3 NT by a way similar to Joshs suggestion.
I am still not convinced, that 4 is the best contract.
If rho has the shortness in diamonds, you will always loose.
But in 3 NT, is it really possible, that they never touch Clubs even after winning a diamond trick.
Kind Regards

Roland


Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users