BBO Discussion Forums: Teams, over a preempt - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Teams, over a preempt

#21 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2013-July-09, 13:41

I don't understand 4NT. It seems that the two posters who are recommending it state that it shows clubs and a major. If so, why would you be interested in playing the major at the 5 level?

I would rather bid 4 than show both suits if showing both suits means bidding 4NT.
0

#22 User is offline   CSGibson 

  • Tubthumper
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,835
  • Joined: 2007-July-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portland, OR, USA
  • Interests:Bridge, pool, financial crime. New experiences, new people.

Posted 2013-July-09, 14:50

View PostArtK78, on 2013-July-09, 13:41, said:

I don't understand 4NT. It seems that the two posters who are recommending it state that it shows clubs and a major. If so, why would you be interested in playing the major at the 5 level?

I would rather bid 4 than show both suits if showing both suits means bidding 4NT.



It seems pretty simple. The 4S bidders are betting that either S is the right denomination, that we can only take 10 tricks in spades, or that when clubs is right, the opps will do something to let us know, or that 4S won't be doubled where 5S might be, etc.

The 4N bidders are wagering that 11 tricks are available as long as they get to the right strain, and are showing the 2-places-to-play in an attempt to do so. It even emphasizes clubs in my mind.

The 5C bidders appear to be getting the worst of both worlds IMO - committing to one strain, and committing to 11 tricks - perhaps they reserve 4N for a different hand type.
Chris Gibson
0

#23 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2013-July-10, 01:31

View PostCSGibson, on 2013-July-09, 14:50, said:

The 5C bidders appear to be getting the worst of both worlds IMO - committing to one strain, and committing to 11 tricks - perhaps they reserve 4N for a different hand type.

I play it as a slam try with clubs and a major.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#24 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2013-July-10, 01:34

Does nobody play 4NT as natural?
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#25 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2013-July-10, 01:38

View Postgwnn, on 2013-July-10, 01:34, said:

Does nobody play 4NT as natural?

Yes, I do that in at least one partnership. I don't think I've ever bid it though.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#26 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2013-July-10, 02:25

Maybe it's a better treatment than generally thought, if only to remove the temptation on bidding it on hands like this.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#27 User is offline   IVAN CY LO 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 233
  • Joined: 2013-June-26

Posted 2013-July-10, 03:24

View PostCSGibson, on 2013-July-05, 16:45, said:



Vul vs not in a sectional swiss, playing the event favorites and leaders (you are a close 2nd). RHO is a bit of a wild-card. Do you take action? If so, what?


Only 10 HCP on hand and still rooms for partner to balancing reopen. I will stay pass for this pre-emp action.
0

#28 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2013-July-10, 07:47

View PostIVAN CY LO, on 2013-July-10, 03:24, said:

Only 10 HCP on hand and still rooms for partner to balancing reopen. I will stay pass for this pre-emp action.

I guess you wouldn't act on

AKQJTxxxxxxxx
-----
-----
-----

for the same reason.

That is not to say that pass is an unreasonable action on the given hand. Only the rationale is completely wrong.
1

#29 User is offline   Phil 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,092
  • Joined: 2008-December-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Texas, USA
  • Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2013-July-10, 13:56

On record for 4 at another website.

On BBF, the comments seem to indicate its close between 4 and pass. The other poll was much more tilted toward pass.
Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
0

#30 User is offline   IVAN CY LO 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 233
  • Joined: 2013-June-26

Posted 2013-July-10, 19:34

View PostArtK78, on 2013-July-10, 07:47, said:

I guess you wouldn't act on

AKQJTxxxxxxxx
-----
-----
-----

for the same reason.

That is not to say that pass is an unreasonable action on the given hand. Only the rationale is completely wrong.


Rationale is I would choose to pass with such quality of 2 suits and with just a fair strength of hand.
0

#31 User is offline   MrAce 

  • VIP Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,971
  • Joined: 2009-November-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston, TX

Posted 2013-July-11, 04:13

View PostPhil, on 2013-July-10, 13:56, said:

On record for 4 at another website.

On BBF, the comments seem to indicate its close between 4 and pass. The other poll was much more tilted toward pass.



I don't really care much about the quantity of votes. In this site or another. I prefer paying attention who voted for what.

From my post you can easily see i have strong feelings for pass, however 3/4 of my favourite posters (in this topic) prefered to bid (Wank, Roger, Andy) and MikeH admitted that he leans towards pass. Wank admitted that it is dangerous action, while another poster stated that this is a "WTP 4" lol. That alone explains why i don't really care about the quantity of votes. Two people can vote for same option and still can be way too distanced from from each other about how they see the same hand. After reading Andy's post i wanted to write same thing that MikeH did about what to bid if i was forced to bid something. I really like 5 more than 4 and the reasons for that is well explained by Andy.
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"

"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."





0

#32 User is offline   jogs 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,316
  • Joined: 2011-March-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:student of the game

Posted 2013-July-12, 09:49

View PostArtK78, on 2013-July-10, 07:47, said:

I guess you wouldn't act on

AKQJTxxxxxxxx
-----
-----
-----

for the same reason.

That is not to say that pass is an unreasonable action on the given hand. Only the rationale is completely wrong.


The A isn't carrying full weight on offense.
Axxxx, x, x, AQxxxx
Most of this board would choose to bid with this hand.
0

#33 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2013-July-12, 10:19

View Postjogs, on 2013-July-12, 09:49, said:

The A isn't carrying full weight on offense.
Axxxx, x, x, AQxxxx
Most of this board would choose to bid with this hand.

No, ALL of this board would choose to bid with this hand.
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users